User talk:Medha0110

Welcome!
Hello, Medha0110, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Osho Tapoban, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dewritech (talk)  12:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Osho Tapoban


A tag has been placed on Osho Tapoban, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Dewritech (talk)  12:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Fixing the article
Hello. The article has been moved to User:Medha0110/Osho Tapoban. Please don't panic at finding it gone. :) I will be leaving you a more detailed note in just a minute about how to fix the problems the other editor found. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Writing articles
First, I assume that you found my name in the logs for the article. While it is true that I once deleted an article under that title, it was in 2009 and had nothing to do with the current content. Somebody else flagged it this time, and I can only advise you on what may have triggered their concerns.

First, you have been either been given or have taken kind of a difficult subject to write about. :/ It's not impossible, but you will want to be very careful to avoid using language that sounds like you are writing for a tour guide. We don't ever say things like "Osho Tapopn is great place for birdwatchers and nature lovers" in our articles. It's not our place to make that judgment. :) We also do not describe ground as "holy" or environments as "vibrant". Our goal is not to make people want to go to this place. Our purpose here is to write neutral summaries of what reliable sources have said about notable subjects.

If I were writing an article about this place, I would be using sources like this and these (you can cite the ones you can preview).

I would neutrally describe what they are, using information (but not language) drawn from those sources and citing them. I would remove anything that sounds like a travel brochure. Once that is done, you can move the article back into article space (I will help you, if you need - just let me know at my talk page) and hope that it no longer seems like a problem to the editor who reviewed it or to others. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)