User talk:MediaPontMbale

May 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cullen328 (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * MediaPontMbale (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Please know that per Wikipedia's username policy, a Wikipedia account may never be shared amongst several people, for any reason. Only the same single individual may access this account for its entire lifetime. If several people intend to edit Wikipedia, then each of them must create their own account for their sole use only. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Please also realize that an organization is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists, or is a worthy cause. The determining factor is whether or not the organization meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for organizations. For this to happen, the organization must have already received significant coverage from multiple reliable, third-party sources. Lack of such coverage means that the organization simply isn't notable enough for inclusion.


 * Writing about your own organization is an inherent conflict of interest. You are not an objective judge of your organization's notability, and will find it difficult to understand that using Wikipedia to publicize your organization's existence is promotion, whether or not you believe it to be. If your organization is truly notable and has gained the required level of interest from independent sources, someone not connected to it will eventually write about it. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 19 May 2022 (UTC)