User talk:Mediasantjordi

Welcome to Wikipedia!
- Welcome-

Self-published source
I see you have again recopied the Paulo Coelho list of prizes and awards to the article about him. Since you were welcomed to Wikipedia five years ago, you should in that time to have learned that you ought to be providing edit summaries, especially when you are adding such a large amount of information. You ought also to be aware of editorial guidelines. In adding that list you have transgressed two of them. First of all, with regard to WP:COPYOTHERS, though you give the source of the list, you do not indicate that you have permission to copy and paste from that website. Even more questionable is that the fact that the so-called Paulo Coelho Foundation from which the list originates is a self-published source from the author's personal address in Switzerland, and that is against the WP:SPS guideline. There is nothing to stop you using the list as a source of information, but you will have to provide an independent reference for each of those awards and exercize judgement over which of them is significant. Since many awards are for The Alchemist, there are probably better ways of presenting the information too. Sweetpool50 (talk) 10:11, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

You have an admitted conflict of interest and must now adhere to our policy on paid editors
Here at es.wiki you state "To have an updated information, we have to wait for another user to buy the book, read it and decide to update this section? Who better than us to have official and current information of the author?"

Please read WP:PAID and WP:COI and follow the instructions there, including adding the required template to your user page. You can post suggestions to the talk page and make minor technical edits, but you can't make major edits to any page where you have a relationship with the subject. Doug Weller talk 13:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Awards, etc.
You can suggest awards on the talk page. These will have to already have their own articles showing they meet our notability requirements. And they will need independent sources, normally the awarding body. Doug Weller talk 13:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Magical Moment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Magical Moment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Magical Moment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Donald Albury 22:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

The Magical Moment nominated for deletion
The article, The Magical Moment, has been nominated for deletion. You may comment on the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magical Moment Donald Albury 22:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)