User talk:Mediasource2011

Welcome! You've worked on Bain more than McKinsey of late at least, but your recent work on McKinsey, in a quick scan, looked productive, to the point, helpful. As a long laborer on McK's and even more particularly on Rajat Gupta's articles, I much appreciate new productive input and I look, here, to encourage you to take another (small) step.

In short, I would just hope you'd establish a user page by clicking on this [formerly Swliv (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)] red link User:Mediasource2011 and introducing yourself however minimally. Then (as I have "taken the red out" of your "talk" page) you will have taken the red out of your user name.

OK? Inquire if queries (click on my (blue) "talk" right ... over here -->). Cheers. Swliv (talk) 23:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * One added note: If you "sign" entries @ the end on user and user-talk pages with four tildas ("~"s), then your user name and the date will be recorded automatically (the squib, above, "Swliv (talk) 23:5..."; another, updated, above and hereafter). Swliv (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Bain & Company
I am sorry, but I have reverted your edit of 20 September 2011 01:36 (UTC). The content was not supported by the sources: Please discuss these on the talk page.--Toddy1 (talk) 04:52, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk:Bain & Company
 * Talk:Bain & Company
 * Talk:Bain & Company
 * Talk:Bain & Company

Please will you discuss contentious edits on the talk page, instead of just reverting. I have posted your edit summary on the talk page.--Toddy1 (talk) 08:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Please could you contribute your opinion to the following. We would very much like to know your reasoning. --Toddy1 (talk) 16:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk:Bain & Company
 * Talk:Bain & Company
 * Talk:Bain & Company

Bain & Company and 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.

It would be much more productive if you could add the content and your rationale to the article talk pages rather than the articles themselves. You say that "the reasoning is clear," but Wikipedia is not a place for original research. The connections you are trying to establish are not at all supported by the article you cite. All they do is describe events that happened at the same time, with no causal connection. NJmeditor (talk) 11:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

There is no backup for the stuff you wrote regarding what you call the "Bain India incident" on Bain & Company. You and your friend wrote about corruption, and backed it up with citations to sources that did not mention corruption. You wrote about Bain influencing things, and backed it up with citations to sources that did not mention Bain. You wrote about an anti-corruption campaigner, cobbling together information that seems to be about several people of the same name, and adding to it information not backed up by any of sources you cited.

The document you have just posted on Talk:Bain & Company has not been published by a reliable source. Wikipedia cannot use it.

Please stop posting nonsense on Wikipedia.--Toddy1 (talk) 05:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)