User talk:Mediazeitgeist

Copyright problem on Chatelaine (magazine)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Chatelaine (magazine), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Simple introduction
 * Help pages

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mediazeitgeist. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Chatelaine (magazine), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:57, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

While flattered, I am a constant student of media, always searching to expand my knowledge base to better my skills as a business professional, creative, and mentor. I have no association with Chatelaine personally, nor do family, friends and my employment organization. I don't work for or with magazines. I do have a love of media and a passion for history and iconic brands. Please amend. --Mediazeitgeist

Help me!
Please help me with... I have reached out to CanadianMags Blogspot and MiddleBrowCanada as I do not believe their content is copyrighted. In the meantime, please confirm if you know otherwise.

Mediazeitgeist (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * , you appear to misunderstand how copyright works. Under the Berne Convention and succeeding international agreements, all published works are copyright the moment they are published and there is no requirement to register a copyright (as many Internet users mistakenly think).  Canada has been a state party these agreements since 1924 so any work published there is covered and any of "their" content is copyrighted.  More to the point, Wikipedia policy requires us to treat their content as copyrighted unless you can explicitly show that it is actually public domain prior to the blogs publishing it or their content is accompanied by explicit release permission granted by the copyright holder.  I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)