User talk:Medical Imaging

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Oldendorf small.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Oldendorf small.JPG. The copy called Image:Oldendorf small.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Ananda1.JPG
is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Ananda1.JPG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Ananda1.jpg
is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Ananda1.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ananda1 small.jpg
Hi, this image should be released under a free license. Thank you ˉˉanetode╦╩ 10:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Oldendorf.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Oldendorf.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bengali Kids of Princeton Area - BKPA


A tag has been placed on The Bengali Kids of Princeton Area - BKPA, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:BKPA Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:BKPA Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bengali Kids of Princeton Area - BKPA


A tag has been placed on The Bengali Kids of Princeton Area - BKPA, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 09:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Note that although educational institutions can't be deleted just on notability grounds, all articles are liable to deletion as spam, criterion G11. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references at all, just two links to their website, obviously not independent third-party sources. Note also that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting

Medical Imaging --NB: There was a verifiable source that was uploaded as reference for the BKPA's activities: See pages 10 and 11 in the publication by the Princeton Public Library at https://issuu.com/princetonpubliclibrary/docs/connections_fall_2015 (This reference wasa provided; it was apparently deleted as part of "speedy deletion").


 * There is nothing to show that it meets the notability criteria. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of staff, funding and expenditure. It seems to be very local, so might not be notable even with that information.

Medical Imaging --I don't know the number of staff, funding, or expenditure as I DO NOT WORK FOR THE BKPA, NOR AM I PAID BY THEM. I am just a member of the community that is rather impressed by what these kids have been able to accomplish.


 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  dedicated to helping children... in a fun way... it is a rare entity in the world...&mdash; and that's just the lead.

Medical Imaging --The statement about their purpose is taken from their website, http://www.bkpa.org/. If this language is objectionable, it can be removed; however, I hardly think it warrants removal of the entire article!


 * I note that you have created only this article in recent years. If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Medical Imaging -- I have written other articles for Wikipedia before and performed edits of articles on various topics but mainly about science and scientists. I hardly think that writing an article about a nonprofit therefore constitutes a reason to suspect CoI. It is true that I have been dormant for some time, but as I mentioned above, I do not work for the BKPA, nor am I paid by them. I live in the same community as they do. Is that a CoI? Do I have to go back to writing only scientific articles?

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  18:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Before attempting to write an article again, please read this guidance
 * If you wish to try again, please read the above carefully first so that you know what you need to do, and note that educational organisations can be deleted through the AfD procedure, so if it isn't notable, you may be wasting your time. If you wish to proceed, you should write as a draft initially anyway. If, having read all of the above and answered the COI query, you wish to continue, I could restore the deleted text, suitably modified, to a user page for improvement Jimfbleak - talk to me?  18:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Medical Imaging -- I have read the guidance. It makes no mention of the "criteria" by which "notability" is established. It seems that the criteria for establishing "notability", and therefore, choosing whether or not to delete the article quickly, is VERY SUBJECTIVE. I am not saying this article is in its polished, final form... yes, there is room for improvement (as with all Wikipedia articles - that's the beauty of Wikipedia!)... but this organization (the BKPA) is out there in a community (Princeton) that references Wikipedia frequently, and could stand to use read information on a wiki to corroborate what they see. Please restore the deleted text, modified as deemed necessary, in a user page for improvement.

AfC notification: Draft:Mackenzie Molner has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mackenzie Molner. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 21:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mackenzie Molner (March 9)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mackenzie Molner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mackenzie Molner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mackenzie_Molner Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dial911&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mackenzie_Molner reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mackenzie Molner (May 12)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Mackenzie Molner may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Medical_Imaging Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shadowowl&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Medical_Imaging reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  14:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)