User talk:Medicalrenaissance

Speedy deletion of Medical Renaissance: The Secret Code
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justin Eiler (talk) 22:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Medical Renaissance: The Secret Code
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Medical Renaissance: The Secret Code, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://audience.withoutabox.com/films/thesecretcode. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Your articles
Wikipedia is not the place for you to write a story, or promote a documentary with no links that isn't out yet. If you cannot supply links (from third-party sources - not your own website) that asserts this documentary exists and is notable, then do not put the article back. --Golbez (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)