User talk:Medigeek

Article "verdicts"
Subjective declarations about film's perceived success do not belong in articles as you added here and here and here and here, etc. Firstly, any opinion must be directly attributed to a reliable published source, not pulled out thin air. Secondly, hyperbolic terms like "hit", "blockbuster", "super hit", "disaster", "flop" don't belong in an enyclopedia article. Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, so we write about subjects in a neutral fashion. Rotten Tomatoes has a pass/fail grading system for films. Films that don't do well, it stamps as "rotten". Yet we never say "The film was declared rotten". We're not here to gush over films we like or condemn films we hate, and these verdict terms convey absolutely no information of academic value. Nobody can objectively quantify the difference between a flop and a super-flop in rupees. Keep it neutral. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of highest-grossing Telugu films:, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please don't add WP:NOTRS like sacnilk and bollywoodmoviereviewz. See WP:ICTFSOURCES for acceptable sources.'' Ab207 (talk) 07:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)