User talk:Medisinmannen

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I have noticed you were working on the BCtect thing, ask some experienced folks at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine for advice. Richiez (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allumera


A tag has been placed on Allumera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 20:07, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Promotion need not just be for commercial purposes (as in selling products), but in promoting (i.e. bringing to the public eye) a product or company. None of the references provided were from independent sources (one was from the company's own website, the other two from the company's own press releases), and as "The product is not ready for the market yet" I do not see how it can be counted as notable - but the reason for deletion is not the notability (or otherwise) of the product, but as it reads like promotional text --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allumera


The article Allumera has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant coverage in third-party sources. Zero results in Google Scholar. Of the four references in the article, only one mentions the name "Allumera", and this is a press release. (Note that article was previously speedy deleted as G11.)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SheepNotGoats (talk) 17:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Allumera for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allumera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Allumera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SheepNotGoats (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand why this article need to be deleted, but I do not now to much about the rules of Wikipedia. This is a Cosmetic product and I do not think there is other cosmetic product with better scientific results and technology than Allumera. The product is based on Photodynamic Therapy and the scientific studies is based on 5-ALA which is the same as another Photocure product Metvix for skin cancer. Photocure is also conducting clinical trails on Visonac a 5-ALA product for Acne. Allumera is not mentioned in the article but this experience Photocure has developed Allumera. I am not sure if I am expressing my meaning in the correct Wikipedia way. This article is not like my first article that was deleted because it seemed like advertisement. Medisinmannen (talk) 18:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cevira, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tissue and Cervical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:PAID/WP:COI
You need to read and follow. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)