User talk:Medwa823

Welcome!
Hello, Medwa823, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Brody Scott Peer Review BrodyKRS (talk) 01:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

In first para. possible changes:

Cherie Dimaline is a Métis writer and author. (line 1 in intro)

Bibliography:

You can link the pages of her books even if there is none created yet, it creates an open page for someone to input information and the links turn red. I believe this is easier when it is actually uploaded live.

Awards:

What year did she win the Fiction Book of the Year? (line 2 under awards)

Dimaline’s newest novel, Empire of Wild, has been named Indigos #1 Best Book of 2019. (final sentence under awards)

References Link that is broken:

7. ^ librarysearch.mtroyal.ca https://librarysearch.mtroyal.ca/discovery/search?query=any,contains,Cherie%20Dimaline%20chatelaine&tab=Everything&search_scope=All&vid=01MTROYAL_INST:02MTROYAL_INST&offset=0. Retrieved 2020-03-02. Missing or empty |title= (help)

Other then this source all references link to the pages listed, and all pages are active and none of the references are self biographical of the author.

In references:

Personally, I would remove the Retrieved date and just leave the articles publication date.

As a whole the article seems to be very well balanced and structured. There is no bias or personal opinion of Dimaline herself, it seems to all be straight forward factual information from secondary, scholarly sources. The minor changes I suggested in terms of sentence restructure do not have to be taken into deep consideration, just a suggestion! The link number 7 is a must, and the retreived dates in the sources are only a suggestion as well.

Great work though! The flow and structure and timeline all makes sense to me! BrodyKRS (talk) 01:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)