User talk:Meegee

License tagging for Image:Power Abusing Teacher that assaulted and traumatized the student.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Power Abusing Teacher that assaulted and traumatized the student.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Unless you can provide sources, don't add it. -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 11:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 05:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

I fail to see how I have added defamatory content. I was doing nothing but stating the truth. If you're talking about citing sources the whole wikipedia article on National Experimental High School lacks sources. Just because the section I have added happens to deal with a controversial event does not mean it is false and not true. I can understand the claim about sources, however as the victim of the event did not file any official charges there were no official "records". However I assure you there were board meetings regarding the event. If you want to hammer me down on not citing any sources, hammer down on the whole article, as no where in the article are there any sources. If you're going to extend justice, extend it to all. See not the speaker, but what the speaker has to say, just because the section is asserting claims that may have a negative image on a non-named teacher, does not mean it is not true.


 * I'm not saying that the information you are adding is false. It might be true; but wikipedia can't accept negative content about a person/organization without reliable sources. As for the whole article; yes it lacks sources and many other articles do, but as long as the content is not negative (or positive but outright fabrications) its fine. Since the alleged controversy was not documented officially or covered by media, you should not add it (say wikipedia's policies; see WP:Libel).-Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 06:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Meegee/Sandbox
A tag has been placed on User:Meegee/Sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 00:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)