User talk:Meemhamza

Briss (Software)
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Briss (Software), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://briss.sourceforge.net.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Boox


A tag has been placed on Boox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TransporterMan ( TALK ) 19:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Boox
Hello. You asked what the problem with the article was.

The article seemed to be more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article. It included a long list of features and a revision history that one might expect to find on a promotional website, not in an encyclopedia article. Finally, it cited no reliable sources about Boox. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

__________________________________________________________

I just write the article from a free reference source (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5):

http://wiki.mobileread.com/wiki/Boox60

So, this article is not an advertisement, MobileRead Wiki is a a #1 reference for many E-Reader devices, and I don't have any relation with producer company or any other benefit ! It's just a simple article for a device like Kindle, Sony Reader, iPod, a Nokia cellphone ..

Well, I'll rewrite the article again from scratch, but I am not sure you like it or not!

Meemhamza (talk) 05:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boox


The article Boox has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of WP:notability. No WP:reliable sources. Just because it exists does not make it notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Briss (software)


The article Briss (software) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication WP:notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Endofskull. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lightweight Linux distribution seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''On your entry of Semplice on Lightweight Linux distribution. Described as "non-innovative" Specific edit can be seen here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lightweight_Linux_distribution&diff=prev&oldid=529733912'' Endofskull (talk) 22:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Semplice Linux for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Semplice Linux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Semplice Linux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)