User talk:Meenkus

If changing now deleted without comment in View History no entry.

AREVA is reliable source for own design ANTARES Pebble bed reactor and I am reliable source for own THOR reactor design and LEAVE THIS WARNING INSIDE about ThO2/UO2 dividing risk also to put into other places commonly not known easy to check looking at ThO2/UO2 and www.thtr.de. Other countries maybe else do same mistake like before.

I was stopper of ESCOM PBMR with warnings to ESCOM, African Union & IAEO... about burning risk... years ago maybe comming indirectly in your sides. Using SiC as burning protection layyer also from myself before only against outgoings now at ESCOM sides but only subpebbles not enough. THOR design before also graphite with SIC/BeO layers on (sub)&pebbles&walls and stoppsandsystem added SiO2+Mo2B5/HfB2+10BN... also for cooling in case of he-pressure loss else rising up 2300° was calculated from AVR for THTR 300 also melting point of SiC layer best new material 11BN not burnable stable and dense up to 2800° in inert gas nearly diamond hard, not soluble in water, not going radio- active look B+N isotopes less 7.5s half life time is breakthrough HTR ESCOM PBMR no melting point rised steal after 1m graphite or active cooling after direct gas turbine loss with air back channel after hole air in rad. smoke out until ash and collecting bottom with after melt. BUT RESTART with 11BN possible best THOR design already Full Zero Risk. Only way out for fision material/products melting out in special stoven also after A380 breakthrough pebbles hold about 99.9% inside also with water behind but Mo-steal+<1m concrete+W-steal(NAK77 cooled+11BN before. He out air(O+N)/water inout no problem stopped <1s stoppsand+rods side- walls turnable with reflector/absorber side and between rods and stopp- bottom. 11BN tubes with holes between pebble bed for rods and chimney. pebble bed outside not running without side neutrons back and flatend.

Why you don`t know about Areva Antares ThO2/UO2 11BN... Who reliable ?

BEST EXPERT Kay Uwe Böhm All Rights Reserved kayuwebohem(at)yahoo.de

Response
The information you are trying to relay is not relevant to the article and is much too detailed. You also have trouble communicating your ideas effectively in English which makes it difficult to understand what you want to add. You must also cite any sources for your information, not just your own first-hand knowledge. You do not sign your name when editing articles. You have been warned by multiple contributors; I suggest you stop trying to force edits or you will be banned. If you want the information to stay up, write it in clear, syntactically correct & grammatical English with references.

Thanks.