User talk:Meetrockin

Please convert sources to Footnotes
See my comment at top: Draft:Shraddha Sharma. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Vlcsnap-2014-10-14-11h22m11s211.png
Thanks for uploading File:Vlcsnap-2014-10-14-11h22m11s211.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shraddha Sharma has been accepted
 Shraddha Sharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bjelleklang -  talk 11:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Meetrockin help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Shraddha Sharma
Hi. Please do not make edits such as the ones you did at Shraddha Sharma. We have a very strict policy on biographies on living persons, such as requiring all information to be attributed to a reliable source and also using a neutral language when writing articles. Please keep this in mind when you edit this article, and keep to the subject as much as possible. Bjelleklang -  talk 01:42, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Please avoid adding information that cannot be directly attributed to a reliable source. Youtube is not such a source. Also, there is no need for a table containing her one album, and there is no need to list every little thing she has appeared on. The Windsong festival doesn't list her in their lineup, so in other words her appearance there is likely to be minor, and thus just another gig not really worth mentioning.
 * Keep the article short and to the facts for now, she simply hasn't done a lot worth covering (yet), and leaving stuff like the number of Facebook/Twitter/Instagram/Youtube followers out of the article improves the readability for other readers. As mentioned before we have a strict policy on biographies at Wikipedia, and we must adhere to these rules. Bjelleklang -  talk 14:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm responding to your post at my talkpage here if you don't mind.
 * First of all, please review WP:UNDUE and WP:RS. The fact that she became famous for her Youtube videos doesn't make Youtube a reliable source in this context, and it also comes in under the section on self published sources in the verifiability policy. We still require reliable sources to back up any claims and content in an article, especially for BLPs. When you write wikipedia made from the little little information you are only partially correct; Shraddha Sharma is borderline notable for becoming Indias most viewed Youtube artist, and for having released a record. That's it. She isn't notable for appearing in ads, having her song appear in ads, for not appearing on various TV shows, and the number of videos she has on what Youtube channel isn't important. At best, we add an external link to the Youtube channels, we don't list each and every detail about the videos found there.
 * Until there are proper reliable sources detailing other things she's done, assuming that they are relevant, we can add more information. Regarding Windsong; even if there is a video of her appearing there it doesn't make the appearance notable. If you have a reliable source mentioning her appearance there it might be listed if it gives some context, but keep in mind that a Youtube video isn't regarded as a reliable source.
 * As for the table listing the record; is it really needed? Isn't it enough to state that she released a record produced with Leslie Lewis, Jim Beanz and Ankur Tiwari, and that Ankur Tewari appeared on one of the tracks? If people want the track listing of a (non-notable) record we can point them to an external site. Listing all the tracks isn't needed, especially as none of them appear to be notable by themselves.
 * Lastly I just want to remind you that Wikipedia has a number of policies. I have my opinions on what to keep in articles, but the policies are the basis for everything, and have been decided upon by the community. What is likely to happen with an article if there is a content dispute is that the article is frozen with no updates possible until a discussion on the talkpage has resolved the issues. Bjelleklang -  talk 10:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have restored the article to my revision again. There is no need to list every little detail of where someones music have been used (ads), where they have played, or what they've done. She has released one album, gotten some attention as a result of being popular on Youtube, and let's leave it at that. Until there is more coverage the article should be left as is. Bjelleklang -  talk 17:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have restored the article again, and have to ask: What is your relation to Shraddha Sharma? She is barely notable, and I had to rewrite/shorten the draft you submitted for it to be acceptable as per our policies. Please keep this in mind. Bjelleklang -  talk 18:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * As you mention; "I'm her fan, & i want to give her a new year surprise !" This is really not compatible with writing an encyclopedia, so I would suggest that you read up on the guideline regarding conflict of interest. We simply cannot add every little detail about an artist, we have to consider the amount of details compared to what the person has actually accomplished. As mentioned the article would not have been accepted in the form you are trying to force it towards; she has one record which is non-notable; there is no need to list every track on it with a link to ITunes, especially when the info on all (but one) of the tracks are the same. Bjelleklang -  talk 13:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you please give me some examples of other articles where everything is listed? Also, please read Other_stuff_exists. The short version is that just because another article exists or has content of a given type, it doesn't automatically justify that another article contains the same. Bjelleklang -  talk 17:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

If you look at the artists you have mentioned, you'll notice that every one of them are notable for multiple things. None of them lists every little detail of their lives; they focus mostly on what is relevant. Bieber is the big exception here, but then again his article is backed by 160 different sources, and he has also been the subject of multiple books. Please re-read Other_stuff_exists; simply because something exists in another article isn't an automatic reason to include it in all articles. Bjelleklang -  talk 15:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Armaan Malik; finalist in a notable singing competition, contributed to multiple notable films and 100-200 commercials
 * Aditya Narayan; multiple notable awards, appeared in multiple notable films and led several notable TV shows.
 * Mohammad Irfan Ali; contributed to multiple notable films.
 * Austin_Mahone; nominated and have won multiple notable awards, appeared in several notable films.
 * Exactly; they are notable for multiple things, while Shraddha Sharma has primarily gotten coverage for being one of the most viewed Indian Youtube artists who happens to be releasing an album. Being popular on Youtube or releasing a record is usually (almost never) enough by itself to become notable, and if she only did one of these things it's likely that the article would have been deleted. The other artists you mention doesn't list everything they've done; they list a sample. Armaan Malik doesn't contain his complete discography, only a list of songs from some of the movies he's contributed to and not everything. Sharma has released one record so far; it's already mentioned in the article and until the day when it becomes notable, or she has a notable hit from it we shouldn't list every individual song from it.
 * Keep in mind what the guideline to notability says; "It is important to remember that "notable" is not a synonym for "famous". Someone may have become famous due to one event, but may nevertheless be notable for more than one event. Similarly, a person may be generally famous, but notable for only a single event." She may end up receiving more coverage sometime in the future, but for now there simply isn't enough. Bjelleklang -  talk 22:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Shraddha Sharma‎
Hi. I've tried to explain to you why you can't make such edits which I have now reverted. Please refrain from editing the article as you have earlier stated that you're a "fan, & i want to give her a new year surprise". You seem to have COI-related issues, so consider this a warning. The next time you risk being blocked. Bjelleklang -  talk 07:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shraddha Sharma


A tag has been placed on Shraddha Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)