User talk:MegaLady

Speedy deletion nomination of Jo So Hial


A tag has been placed on Jo So Hial requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hial in 2011.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Hial in 2011.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:Hial in 2011.JPG. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Images and other media must only be uploaded if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

A sandbox
Hello MegaLady. Consider working in a sandbox so that your user page doesn't look like an article. Here's one you can use: User:MegaLady/Sandbox1

Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Also, then you can make your userpage insanely cool. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Jo So Hial
I've moved the article you've been creating on your user page to the sandbox I made for you here: User:MegaLady/Sandbox1

I did this per: WP:FAKEARTICLE. I checked google and the fight table. It looks like fiction. Also, you tried to put it in the mainspace two days ago and it got deleted.

I tried communicating with you on your talk before, but you ignored me. I'm not quite sure why you're spending so much time on this. It really just looks like a hoax that will never be allowed in the mainspace.

Let me know if I can help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hial in 2011.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Hial in 2011.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hial in 2011.JPG


A tag has been placed on File:Hial in 2011.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Team Kolton


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Baseball  Watcher  21:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi again Megalady. I've been watching you make hundreds of edits to your sandbox drafts. It seems that you would be a good editor in the mainspace. I see 750 edits that could have been used to improve the encyclopedia. We could use your talents.

I'm not sure what you intend to do with your sandbox articles. They will never be allowed in the mainspace because they will be discovered as hoaxes right away. I'm just so curious. Why not work on some real articles? I will help you any way I can. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your behaviour on Wikipedia
Hello megaLady. I can see that you're doing a lot of work here - unfortunately, very very little of it is helping Wikipedia, and to me, it looks like you're using us almost as a web host, which we're not. The material you're producing in your multiple sandboxes is unlikely to get put into the encyclopedia, as most of it appears to be a hoax which again, we're not about either.

You have over 2000 edits, only 31 of which did anything in mainspace, on articles and the like - at this rate, you're looking to have some issues fairly soon, if you don't stop the way you're going.

Please work on the encyclopedia - We're not here as a free web host, 50megs.com will help you with that. If all you're here to do is fill sandboxes with hoax material, it's not worth the effort. BarkingFish 12:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

IMPORTANT NOTICE
Wikipedia is not a free webhost for your fiction. All the fiction pages you have created will be deleted within 24 hours; the only reason I am not deleting them immediately is because I'm nice and you might want to save the content to your own hard drive. If you enjoy using the Wikipedia format, you might want to download a free copy of our MediaWiki software, to run locally. DS (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Your fake articles
In a nutshell: Please stop.

Please stop using Wikipedia as your personal web hosting service. Your other sandboxes were deleted, and several editors have kindly asked you to stop. So, please stop.

To summarize: Please stop.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Anna Frodesiak. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- MST  ☆  R   (Happy New Year!) 07:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Anna Frodesiak, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. -- MST  ☆  R   (Happy New Year!) 07:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 07:44, 3 January 2012 (UTC)