User talk:MegaMacX

2

Image copyright problem with Image:Dad in mathew street recording session.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dad in mathew street recording session.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Babcock_in_mathew_street_recording_session.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Babcock_in_mathew_street_recording_session.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 09:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, MegaMacX. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article John Babcock (musician), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Widefox ; talk 20:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Babcock (musician), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. ''Hi MMX, I see you've removed maintenance templates multiple times even after just being warned like this. Pls read the WP:COI guideline and take the measures detailed there. Basically, the article needs secondary sources, and until there are a couple of them, this may be considered as failing notability. Feel free to find some sources and edit within the COI guideline, thanks'' Widefox ; talk 20:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Talk about the article is best on the talk page. Feel free to copy your text (on my talk) to there. Seems you previously removed the COI tag and that was restored by another editor here . I take it this removal of the COI tag was also you? Several of us have explained about the tags and I've given you COI link to read, did you read it? I'm getting the impression that you are not listening and trying to argue about whether the COI guideline applies to you. It does. Instead of arguing against the consensus of other editors, removing maintenance tags etc please consider we work by consensus, nobody WP:OWNs the article and we all have to act in accordance to these guidelines and policies. My advice is to find enough WP:RS to pass WP:N, until that is done, the article may be deleted by anyone. You can do that with a COI, and feel free to edit it within what WP:COI says.  Widefox ; talk 13:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of John Babcock (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Babcock (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Babcock (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox ; talk 13:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)