User talk:Megalomaniac Austro-Hungarians

September 2016
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at George Soros conspiracy theories, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You're clearly the same person as User:Austro-Hungarians and User:Alexander Stubb who keeps trying to promote Soros' book. Sro23 (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at George Soros conspiracy theories. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)