User talk:Megaman en m/Archives/2009/March

Sukantapally
Hey. I've removed your G1 tag from Sukantapally as it's nopt patent nonsense. Have rplace it with an A7 tag. Please be more careful choosing which criterion to use in future ;-). Thanks! Keep up the good work!-- Patton t / c 13:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Leave me alone. 82.40.194.235 (talk) 23:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't need any source about ObsCure
Cause my uncle works for Hydravision and I know the detailes for the 3 game. that's why I edited ObsCure II confirming that ObsCure III is in development more than a year already and Josh and Ashley are the main character. don't believe me then you will see yourself.

Well my source is my uncle so what to do
How can I cite any source I just know what I saw. that's why I wrote it. if you want leave the infro but if you think that this is no apropriate then delete ok. Totaly when the game comes aout all will see all.

The WPVG Newsletter (February 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  00:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Special thingy mabob
Just dropped by to say I got your funky message on my talk page, thanks for it I forgot I couldn't do that. I also did the same thing on Adolphus' talk page as weel but got rid of it after the first message. I won't do it again. Hope this dosn't count as one. see you :)  ' The Ninja  lemming '  16:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

FAIL
Hi Megaman,

Thanks for the heads-up on the lack of source for my Blazing Star claim. I had actually taken the text from that fountain of knowledge of Internet Memes, Encyclopedia Dramatica. I also saw that it was echoed on our own Blazing Star page.

On being pushed for a reference, I trawled the internet briefly, and there seems to be a general consensus that Blazing Star is the most likely source, summed up in a Guardian Online article, which I cited. Because there is (understandably) no way to prove it one way or another, I modified my text to say that it is "widely believed" to have come from Blazing Star. This isn't WP:WEASEL because that's pretty much what the article says.

Hope this works for you!

PS: I'm not actively watching WP much lately due to work pressure, so please respond on my talk page.

--Slashme (talk) 05:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Change in DMC 4.
I feel that the reception section in the Devil May Cry 4 article wikipedia needs more expanding. I don't feel that the original writer included the mixed reaction that the game has gotten. How do I use the talk or Dispute resolution to go about and issue a more netural and agreed statement, there was one earlier but he felt the need to take it down. i wouldn't have resorted to a edit if he were to just accept the agreed mixed reaction statement. (TCT (talk) 07:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC))