User talk:MeganBrady253/sandbox

Article Evaluation I looked at the article academic writing. It does seem like all of the information in the article is relevant to the topic. I didn't like that the article says "Wikipedia's article Fact misguides writers in their interpretation of what a fact actually is" when it discusses the discourse community. I feel like it should have instead said that the way that writers don't think of facts in the same way that Wikipedia's article about facts describes them. I do feel like the article for the most part follows what we have discussed in class about academic writing. They define what a discourse community is and I like that they point out that writers do not have novel arguments. They expand on arguments that a discourse community created. All of the links I tried worked and I was able to find the information the citation was used for

Sources for my English Studies Article
https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/nest20/current I plan on adding more information about the journal as there are only a couple sentences on it. I will add some information on submission guidlines and peer review as well as any other relevant information that i find — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeganBrady253 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)