User talk:Meganly/sandbox


 * Points: 3
 * Grade: B

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Expectations

Language
Meets Expectations Good use of language.

Organization
Exceeds Expectations I'm a little confused as to the edit you're doing. I don't know if its and edit for Rouen on Blaise pascal or on technology, because you have two informational paragraphs about Blaise Pascal but then just one sentence about Francois Descroizilles.

Coding
Exceeds Expectations

Validity
Exceeds Expectations

Completion
Meets Expectations

Relevance
Exceeds Expectations Good choice for topic.

Evaluation
Spelling/ Grammar: Meets Standards; the "History of Guitar in Seville" needs to be either "History of Guitars in Seville" or "History of the Guitar in Seville" Language: Exceeds Standards; the language was professional and brought a lot of cultural relevance to this piece, especially the Spanish names of some composers and guitars, etc.

Organization: Nearly meets standards; the organization was a little confusing because of the museum piece at the beginning of the wiki edit. I think it may flow better from an organizational standpoint if you were to bring the piece on museums down to the bottom so it reads History sections then the museum piece. I did like the way you organized the "Historic Guitar Makers of Seville," the bullets made for a easy read because of them being all different.

Coding: Exceeds Standards

Validity: Meets Standards; for each section the logical explanation is good with not many holes in between each topic you talked about.

Completion: Meets Standards; the museum piece needs more information.Try bring the other two sections together for the museum piece if there are exhibits about those topics in the museums.

Relevance: Exceeds Standards; the topic you picked fits well into the criteria for the second wiki edit!

Sources: Meets Standards; the quality of your sources are great, but I see two Met Museum sources that may be considered one source by the professor, but other than that the sources are professional and well placed in your edit.

Citations: Exceeds Standards; very well placed in your the topics to the point that it helped me better understand certain things you mentioned

References: Exceed Standards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forrestbevington (talk • contribs) 19:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

--Forrestbevington (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds Expectations I do not see any grammar or spelling errors.

Language
Exceeds Expectations Good language.

Organization
Exceeds Expectations Well organized. Ideas flow nicely.

Coding
Exceeds Expectations

Validity
Exceeds Expectations

Completion
Exceeds Expectations Great body of work. Plenty of content.

Relevance
Exceeds Expectations

Evaluation

 * Points: 44.5
 * Grade: A

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds Expectations

Language
Meets Expectations The very first sentence I think should read "they determined or and determined it would be be..." I also think the names of departments are suppose to be capitalized, if that is the actual name of the department. Also in the second section "Food Policy Council" I think should be capitalized.

Organization
Exceeds Expectations

Coding
Exceeds Expectations

Validity
Exceeds Expectations

Completion
Exceeds Expectations Lots of good information, very good sources

Relevance
Exceeds Expectations I really like this page. I have been learning about green and blue infrastructure in my Global Water Scarcity class and I enjoyed learning about the efforts in Ghent to make it more sustainable. Its especially relevant with all the efforts going on right now to make the world more green.

Julia's Peer Review
=Evalulations=


 * Points: 36/40
 * Grade: A (90%)

Spelling/Grammar
Nearly Meets Standards I don't see any spelling errors. However, you are missing commas in a number of your sentences. In your first paragraph, you are missing commas in your sentences that are talking about a year. For example, your first sentence should have a comma after "2007". Your last three sentences in the first paragraph also should have commas after the year. In your Food Policy Council section, your sentence "After various stakeholder discussions and advisement from the city's administration the council concluded in developing a sustainable food policy, 'Gent en Garde" should have a comma after "administration." I would go over your edit and check for similar errors.

Language
Exceeds Expectations Your edit is very informative and does so in a perfect encyclopedic tone.

Organization
Nearly meets standard. Your edit is well organized and utilizes headers in an easy to follow way. However, some context for each topic would be helpful to understand the information. For example, you could put an introduction or summary paragraph underneath your Environmental Impact Reduction header that gives an overview of the topic.

Coding
Exceeds Standard Coding looks perfect.

Validity
Exceeds Standard. All of your information looks accurate and has citations.

Completion
Meets Standards. Your page is complete. It fulfills the required amount of content. However, your "Land Conservation" and "Ecotourism" sections seem incomplete.

Relevance
Nearly meets standard. Your "Land Conservation" on "Ecotourism" seem incomplete and so their relevance is hard to understand.