User talk:Meganpeltz

Welcome to my Talk page!

Welcome Meganpeltz! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 40,553,151 registered editors!

Hello Meganpeltz. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your userpage.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 21:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Careful with ref names
Hi! Your edit here introduced a duplicate ref name error. (Search for 'error:' in the revisions before and after your edit.) I have since fixed this error. --Palosirkka (talk) 08:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Germany
Hi Meganpeltz, thanks for your work on the Germany article. I understand it's frustrating that Nikkimaria is objecting to adding the content to the infobox. However, she has put a huge amount of work into the article, a lot of which was trimming it down to a good size, she had to make some difficult decisions and I respect her opinion. If the content is to be added back despite her objections, I would like at least for her objections to be fairly heard and considered first. It's better to discuss it and reach an agreement, than win by just repeatedly putting it in. It might take a little time to talk it over, but there's no rush really. The article has been that way for about a year already, so I'd suggest leaving it a little longer until it's settled. Would that be ok with you? --IamNotU (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Islam, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 15:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

SPI
I reverted your report as I already made one earlier today. See here. – 2 . O . Boxing  13:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)