User talk:Megapen

Unfulfilled
I believe you have some unfulfilled promises (see below). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.156.92.12 (talk) 23:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Skin Book.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Skin Book.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Genisock2 (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BOOK DERM.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BOOK DERM.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Danseymour.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Danseymour.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 16:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pope & Agca.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pope & Agca.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Requests for rollback/Denied/April 2008. RFRBot (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

User page
Hi, I got your message.

By the way, I'm a PC-user and I have no idea what "Mac-style" means. But the most important part of a user page is what you tell everyone about yourself. So toward that end, I've thrown something up on your user page that you can start filling in, editing, and playing around with. In addition to the content, you can change the colors, the border thickness, etc., until it's something unique to you.

If you need help with anything specific, please let me know and I'll drop by.

Glad to meetchya,

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   17:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

State Limousines of England
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of State Limousines of England, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikicars.org/en/State_Limousines_of_England. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

UN offensive
Your article is great, however the title UN Offensive could refer to any offensive by the United Nations in the past 60 years. I'm going to leave your article alone, but I suggest moving it to something with a much more specific title. Thanks for listening. Czolgolz (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I'm surprised no one has written an article about this important battle. With a more specific title, some wikilinks and sources, this could be a fine article. Czolgolz (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I have added wikilinks and linked to this article from the Korean war article. I'd appreciate feedback. Czolgolz (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Er, I don't know what a barnstar is, but I'd be happy to give you one. Czolgolz (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Help
Sorry for the delay - I've taken a look at your contributions, and I can't see that you've had much experience in dealing with vandalism yet. Take some time learning the ropes manually first - since rollback is intended to be used only for cases of obvious vandalism, I'd like to see that you know what you're getting into first. I noticed that you'd also been declined rollback fairly recently, presumably for the same reason. Do some manual reversions for a while, and come back when you've got some experience. Happy editing! Hers fold  (t/a/c) 20:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Edits Re
OK, unfortunately I can't delete the IP talk again (I posted the first message) so if you wish to have it completely deleted you need to contact an administrator. Make sure you log in especially when editing your userspace and even more especially when you're making a big edit like blanking a user page, to us it appears like a pissed off vandal, thanks. The DominatorTalkEdits 23:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: I found your hidden page
I'm sorry, but that's not it. That's the challenge page, telling you that I have the page. Keep looking, I know you'll find it! Again, I'm sorry. Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 18:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * {| style="border: 1px solid ; background-color: ;"


 * rowspan="2" valign="middle" | Missing barnstarPn.png
 * style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | The Hidden Barnstar
 * style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This user has found Basketball110's secret hidden sub page! Can you find it?
 * } Really bad barnstar, right? :) Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 18:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * } Really bad barnstar, right? :) Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 18:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Link
http://wiki.xyrael.net/w/index.php?title=User:Megapen&action=edit --Megapen (talk) 20:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:mastereditor
Thank you for the note! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Twinkle?
Hi Megapen, sorry to bother you, but I saw your post on the Twinkle page and I'm having the same problem. I see you finally got Twinkle working; how'd you fix it? Thanks! FCSundae (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Chaaaaaa!
When an article falls under the criteria for speedy deletion, there's no need to go through the AfD process. Just tag it with a CSD template and an admin will be along to delete it. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 19:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Bill Lewis (character)
Hi. Why did you revert my edit to Bill Lewis (character)? According to WP:SOAPS guidelines this sections should not be in soap operas characters articles. I am copying from there: '''To keep articles visually appealing and manageable, relationships should be "listed" only in the infobox. ''' (bold in the original!). -- Magioladitis (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I reverted your edit. I hope there is no problem with that. If you still think I am wrong, please revert my edit and we can discuss it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 02:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Emancipation Act
Hi, I redirected the Emancipation Act article to the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 article which covers the act, although now that I think about it. there may be a case for a disambiguation page at the Emancipation Act article.  FlowerpotmaN ·(t) 02:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Please don't use machine translation
I appreciate your attempts to translate articles from pl wiki, but it is evident you are using a machine translation; the resulting articles are close to incomprehensible mess. Please do not translate them unless you are certain you can copyedit them into something meaningful. Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 04:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:Szlachta wiki
Thanks for the info about this, but I don't think there is much about szlachta that cannot go on the English Wikipedia? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * What kind of detailed info cannot be added to Wikipedia? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

MOR Music - York, UK
Hi Megapen, I see you recently created the article MOR Music - York, UK, with maintenance tags but no content. As it was deleted shorty before this, I presume that was a mistake. Were you planning on writing an article there, or should it be deleted again? I would have already tagged it for speedy deletion, as there is no content, but just wanted to check in case you were about to add something to it. Thanks, -- Beloved Freak  19:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

tropical garden
Your recent addition of wikilinks to the tropical garden article have been reverted because they were completely off-topic. If your using a bot or similar tool please verify the suggestions are appropriate before saving the changes. I haven't checked your other recent edits with the link suggesting tool, if you could do so and correct any mistakes it would be good. - Shiftchange (talk) 01:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Harlan
You didn't provide a reason for deletion in this AfD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:NPP suggestions
First, let me say that I'm glad you're so enthusiastic about new page patrol, but I'd like to offer a couple of (hopefully) helpful suggestions.

If you're going to nominate an article for deletion, such as Articles for deletion/Benjamin Harlan, please give a reason for deletion instead of making people guess. Unless it's an article of the type "Jason is ugly hahahahaha", it's usually best to wait a short while before nominating for deletion. Most new contributors aren't familiar with article writing, and it may take them several edits over a couple of hours to get down what they want to say.

Also, when you're tagging new articles with Friendly, please take a minute to think about the tags you're applying. This diff, for example, has several tags that don't apply or duplicate each other. Cleanup and copyedit are essentially the same for this article, and there's really nothing confusing, essay-like, or that needs expert attention in it.

Thanks! --Fabrictramp (talk) 20:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Thanks for the barnstar! I really appreciate it. Cheers! - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 18:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Reply: Barnstar
You're very welcome. Let me know if you want me to adopt you through the adopt-a-user program. Cheers! - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 19:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nominations
When you do AfD nominations, be sure to provide a reason for deletion, rather than simply listing it. It's very important that you state why the article should be deleted, or if you are listing it for some other reason (i.e. if you were completing the AfD on behalf of an anonymous user). Your reason doesn't have to be long (though elaborate if possible to provide context). See Articles for deletion/Nicole Sandler for an example of an AfD where a reason was provided. Thanks for your contributions! nneonneo talk 01:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Michael Fish
It's a stub, and I will fill in more information tomorrow. I'd appreciate it if you would not put it up for deletion two minutes after I added it. Thanks. Larry Dunn (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Elystan Glodrydd
Would you please reconsider your tags on the above article: it is not unreferenced; if it needs copy-editing, why do you not do it? I may not be the most expert, but I do know how to use the sources which I HAVE CITED. You claim to be new user. Is this a case of "fools rush in where angels fear to tread"? Peterkingiron (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Amiel
Hello - this is a new stub - it was created eight minutes before you slapped cleanup, notability and reference tags on it. This is premature and uncalled for. Stubs by definition need expansion - give it a chance to be expanded. Tvoz / talk 02:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Invite
Thanks for the invitation! Let me know if you need any help recruiting users. Thanks again! - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 20:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you have a list of users you want to recruit? - Diligent Terrier  (and friends) 21:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * There are categories for that sort of thing ... and also WikiProject Politics, WikiProject United States presidential elections ... just let me know.  - Diligent Terrier  (and friends) 21:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Where did you get that list from? - Diligent Terrier  (and friends) 22:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

project
Hi. I recently joined the Political Parties wikiproject, I understood it was open for participation. Would you like me to send out invites to some other users that I know are interested in political parties? --Soman (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My suggestions; User:Nightstallion, User:Everyking, User:Checco, User:C mon, User:Relata refero, User:Sesel, User:Oddeivind, User:Warofdreams, User:Electionworld. --Soman (talk) 16:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:Grateful
Sorry I have been extremely busy lately and am not making Wikipedia ads at this time :(. Try asking User:Andrew Hampe, last I knew, he also makes ads for the project.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  23:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Scratch that. He is also no longer available.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  23:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lepus Carnivorus
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lepus Carnivorus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Political Parties..?
A (very) draft discussion on the policy on political parties has been started by me here - User:Doktorbuk/pp. If you can assist with this discussion, or know how to help me get this policy looked at, advanced, and accepted by the larger Wiki community, please let me know. Many thanks doktorb wordsdeeds 19:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: WikiProject Political Parties/Collaboration/June 2008
You can nominate more than one article, but I don't think you can vote for both. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 16:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
Sorry, didn't realize until you pointed it out.

Done
✅ I have signed up for your Wikiproject (see award center).--<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">LAA <font color="#ff0000" face="Times New Roman">Fan 18:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject: Political Parties template
Hi, I tried to help out with the task you listed at the award center, but the template doesn't seem to work if the article hasn't been assessed. See Talk:Reform Party of British Columbia – the template shows up, but it also gives a bunch of coding afterward. GaryColemanFan (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I see. Well, I don't feel comfortable doing assessments for a project that I don't belong to, so I'll leave the tagging to project members. At any rate, I recommend looking into the coding of your template, as it clearly needs to be fixed. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

RickK Barnstar
This is to show that your edits are seen and apprecitated. Keep up the good work!--<font face="Curlz MT" size="3"> Freshbakedpie  <font face="Goudy Old Style" size="2">(Wanna talk?)  \'_'/  22:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure!
You're in, just remember you can be subjected to embarassing acts BUT you cannot be killed. If you wanna be in it tell me on MY Talk page.--Editor510 (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Wait, forget that, you're in!--Editor510 (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Yo
Would appreciate you making good on your offer here - - not planning on officially joining the project, but I did tag 40 articles. Cheers.  Jaakobou <sup style="color:#1F860E;">Chalk Talk  12:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you so much for the award! I really appreciate it. Hope all is well, and let's continue our hard work on WikiProject Political Parties. Cheers! - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 22:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks from me as well. I believe I've now got every Canadian political party tagged for your project. It was pretty eye opening for me, as I had no idea there were that many parties. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar challenge
Hello. As I noted on the Awards Center site, I just completed your challenge. Also (and not to be too picky) you have promised those who meet your challenge a barnstar but have been awarding "awards". I know the difference may seem trivial, but I work on WP:WikiProject Awards and the difference is significant. For a barnstar for this type of challenge, you might consider the WikiProject Barnstar or the Society Barnstar (which topically covers political articles). Anyway, I'll be grateful for your generosity either way but just wanted to make you aware. Thanks! --Eustress (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Alright...
Megapen, your time on the wikistory has come, follow the link:

Your scene!

Enjoy!-- Editor510 <font color="#4CBB17"> drop us a line, mate  19:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll put you on hold. When you get back tell me!-- Editor510 <font color="#4CBB17"> drop us a line, mate  16:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Yo, Megapen!
Ok,you need to know this: The edits allowed for actors is now 5 edits. Three is a bit unfair, I thought. Now for some randomosity.

WIGGIDY WIGGIDY WACK

FLIP FLAP

CLAP TRAP

BLERRRRRJ!

MEHHHHHHHHHH!

FORTHEWIN=FTWN00B

That's better. ;-)=)-- Editor510 <font color="#4CBB17"> drop us a line, mate  19:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiPolitics
Would you be interested in writing for the WikiPolitics blog? Let me know. :) - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 20:36, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Invitation
{| class="plainlinks"
 * colspan="3" valign="left" style="width: 100%; background:Navy; padding: 10px;" |

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 20%; " |US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 20%; " |US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg


 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 60%; " | Hello Megapen,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, « <font face="Tahoma"> Diligent Terrier  Bot    (talk)   22:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.

You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.

Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier. Help us get the project off the ground and flying.
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 60%; " |Air Force One over Mt. Rushmore.jpg


 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }

Proposed deletion of Thomas Stevens (politician)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thomas Stevens (politician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TallNapoleon (talk) 23:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

The Deleting of Info from Pitchfork's Article
Deleting an exhaustive list of albums that have earned a 9.9, 9.8, 9.7, etc from the Pitchfork article is in no way vandalism. Those sections are unnecessary, and are little more than advertising for Pitchfork. You may feel free to disagree, but to claim "vandalism" is ridiculous.158.81.13.145 (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Obama-Ayers controversy
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Grsz  X  20:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Extenal links
Before engaging in further disruptive editing, please read WP:EL, and in particular read WP:LINKSTOAVOID. You have been repeatedly adding inappropriate links (without explanation), even after it has been clearly explained to you why they are inappropriate. If your edits are removed by multiple editors and you still want to add the same material, please discuss it on the talk page first. Thanks! --Loonymonkey (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of American Issues Project
A tag has been placed on American Issues Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Matthew Glennon(Talk to me) 00:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Thomas Stevens (politician)
I have nominated Thomas Stevens (politician), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Thomas Stevens (politician). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TallNapoleon (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC) TallNapoleon (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Scjessey (talk) 23:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar
Hello Megapen. Just a quick note to say thank you very much for the barnstar, it was so nice of you, I'm really chuffed. Thanks so much again, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 16:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue
I see you've edited this template several times. I'd appreciate your input here on merging Skin ulcer and Ulcer (dermatology), and how to handle the link in the template. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 06:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Endocrine-related skin conditions
I wanted to know if the you would review a recent CFD I posted at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_February_21. I am looking to get more opinions. kilbad (talk) 04:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Acral acanthosis nigricans
I have expressed my opposition to the merger at Talk:Acanthosis_nigricans. Please let me know if you need anything else. Also, would you mind reviewing that recent CfD I posted? Thanks again! kilbad (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Re
Thank you for the star, that was very kind. Thank you also for all your work on Wikipedia. kilbad (talk) 18:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Starting to use "cutaneous"
I have proposed a new CfD concerning a derm category. Basically, I want to start using the term "cutaneous" instead of "skin" for most derm categories. Would that be ok with you? See: Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_21.

List of skin-related conditions nominated as featured list candidate
I have continued to work on the list of skin-related conditions, and recently nominated it for FL status. If available, your comments would be greatly appreciated at the nomination page. Regardless, thank you again for your work on wikipedia. ---kilbad (talk) 06:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Government membership
This may be a dumb question, but how do I join WikiProject United States Government? Awg1010 (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem
Thanks for uploading. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Masur (talk) 20:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Megapen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Thomas Stevens (politician) -

Thanks
Thank you for your recent contributions to dermatology-related content. Would you be willing to help with the Bolognia Push? There are still a lot of new articles and redirects to be created. I can e-mail you the login information if you're interested? ---kilbad (talk) 03:38, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that award. That was unexpected and very kind of you. ---kilbad (talk) 21:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject United States Government
Greetings. I noticed that you are one of the members of WikiProject United States Government that are still active so I wanted to ask you a question. It appears that this project is mostly inactive aside from what the members might be doing independently. I was considering suggesting that this project be pulled in under WikiProject United States and wanted to solicit comments from some of this projects members before doing so. As with Washington DC and the others the project would for the most part maintain its own independence but I believe this would benefit both projects. What do you think about this? --Kumioko (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
. --Kumioko (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 22:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Promotional photo Skycar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Promotional photo Skycar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:WikiProject Political parties
Template:WikiProject Political parties has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Politics. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Stanisław Krysicki for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stanisław Krysicki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stanisław Krysicki& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri  <sup style="font-family:Candara; color:#80F;">TALK  23:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Skin Cancer: Recognition and Management for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skin Cancer: Recognition and Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skin Cancer: Recognition and Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri  <sup style="font-family:Candara; color:#80F;">TALK  14:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Political Parties invite
Template:Political Parties invite has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tom Stevens (politician)


The article Tom Stevens (politician) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Questionable notability, see Articles for deletion/Objectivist Party."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sandstein  07:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Danseymour.png


The file File:Danseymour.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)