User talk:Meghankaite/sandbox

After reading and reviewing the article I can conclude that the article hasn't had any new updates or information added for 2 months. The sandbox and "live" article on wikipedia are identical. If I ignore that, then I can say there really isn't much of a lead section, there's really one section in the entire article and it has a lot of good information that can be wisely moved into different sections once headings are added. The structure of this article is hard to speculate on because there are no sections, if I was going off of the one inclusive section that is there, I'd say it isn't in a terrific order. The article speaks of many different aspects that could be listed in an order that would make sense, some of the things listed in the one section is: provenance, history, symbolism, and interpretation. This being said there is a nice balance to this article that once the small issues have been hammered out, this article seems to pull a good deal of information from multiple different sources. The writing also seems to come from a fairly unbiased viewpoint, I can't find any writing that would cause someone to think one way or the other about the altarpiece. The sources listed are a different story, whereas they seem rather credible, it is hard to authenticate because the first three sources are hard copy books, but other than that it seems like a lot of different types of publications went into researching this article. Finally, under the "external links" section, there are two links, one of them is to youtube and has a great video with a deeper explanation of the altarpiece. But the other link is a slide show showcasing lots of different romanesque themes and doesn't seem to belong in the article.

Handsofwool (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)