User talk:Megwd

Welcome!

Hello, Megwd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Sailsbystars (talk • contribs • email) 22:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

US Chamber of Commerce
Ok, I MUST work on uploading to this page soon. I am interested to see what will happen. I have found some scholastic sources from journals that I can use as references...but I need to actually do this. I'm just nervous b/c the formatting and "code" scares me. Got to try! signing off now... Megwd (talk) 17:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I see that you are planning a class project on the United States Chamber of Commerce. Great! It could use some expert attention! I've done some work trying to improve the article myself and look forward to the contributions from you and your class. I will note that I removed the unreliable source tag, since I have cleaned most of the blogs and other unreliable sources from the article a few weeks ago. If you have any questions, you can ask them on the article talk page or by writing on my "talk page" (which you get to by hitting the "talk" button next to my signature. I will also keep an eye on this page so we can communicate. Also, you may want to list your project at Class projects.  Again, welcome!  Sailsbystars (talk • contribs • email) 22:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

From Meg
Hi Sailsbystars, thanks for the info! This really feels over my head, but I'm trying to learn as much as quickly as possible! Thanks for cleaning up the blogs. What is the proper procedure--deleting the "citation?", adding a new one, marking it unreliable?

Also, I had a question about the Mother Jones references. I think they are probably less than reliable if they stand alone. We should get another source up there to agree and/or disagree. I don't know about MJ's editorial review process and I think it probably stands on the extreme side of the circuit. Lastly, the publication says exists to promote an agenda (which would skew their journalistic reporting). Whatever the case, this page is contentious and needs good citations! :) thks


 * Yes, mother jones is a sub-optimal source and it would be nice if there were some other sources available. Unfortunately, the only time USCC seems to make the news is when they've been accused of something controversial. And indeed this is a contentious page.  We had an edit war on the page last month where some groups tried to less than neutrally report on the foreign donors controversy.   One source I've been thinking about adding is this one  which has some history on the org, but is technically a tertiary source.
 * As to procedure, there is no single procedure. Sometimes, you can just remove dubiously sourced statements along with the cite.  Sometimes it makes more sense to remove the cite and put a "citation needed" tag next to a statement.  The best solution is to re-write such statements sourced based on a more reliable or neutral source.  PS, you should sign your statements on talk pages using four tildes.  Sailsbystars (talk • contribs • email) 21:52, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Meg, I saw that you did some updates to the CofC article. Just a few comments. I tweaked your wording a little bit, as we need to make clear that there is no evidence supporting one side over the other in the 2010 funding dispute, but the addition overall is a good one. With regards to your tagging, the tags seem to be mostly well-placed. A better alternative to a tagging spree however, would be to fix the tagged problems. I'll try to do a bit of that before I turn in for the night. Cheers, Sailsbystars (talk) 03:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

recently uploaded images
Thank you for work on the US Chamber of Commerce article. Unfortunately, the image you have uploaded are copyrighted and do not have an appropriate fair-use justification, as they don't really add anything to the article. Sailsbystars (talk) 22:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:22chamber-g-popup.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:22chamber-g-popup.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:49, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:22chamber-g-popup.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:22chamber-g-popup.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:56, 14 January 2011 (UTC)