User talk:Meh259/Ainu language

The lead is good and establishes a lot of the topics that will be fleshed out later, but you might be able to hold off on some of the points like the origins of the written language and the ease with which you can find Ainu online, which seem either superfluous or which you can discuss in later paragraphs, as they aren't main points. I also don't think you need those few random examples of the language in your lead; rather, you can save that for if you decide to do a subheading on their morphology or grammar or something where specific examples/translations may be more relevant. Paigejaru (talk) 06:00, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Final Review
Hi Mohammed, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. The language is, however, not very encyclopedic. 4 points.
 * 2) Structure: The structure is idiosyncratic and does not follow the suggested template. 3 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: It is difficult to gauge the accuracy of many claims, because they are extremely vague and many are not furnished with citations. 3 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of information is relevant. There's a mixture of ethnographic and historical information, not all of which concerns the language rather than the speakers. 3 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 2080/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 5 points.

The final score is 23/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)