User talk:Mehmetcaputcu

Speedy deletion nomination of Crash rate


A tag has been placed on Crash rate, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:32, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Exposure (traffic safety)


A tag has been placed on Exposure (traffic safety), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:32, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Traffic safety performance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Traffic safety performance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Traffic safety performance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  14:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Mickle


The article Robert Mickle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable. Sources provided do not establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♟♙ (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shankar Kapri


A tag has been placed on Shankar Kapri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 12:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shankar Kapri (January 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shankar Kapri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shankar Kapri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shankar_Kapri Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ReaderofthePack&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shankar_Kapri reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mehmetcaputcu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shankar Kapri


A tag has been placed on Draft:Shankar Kapri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hatchens (talk) 12:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Guidance
You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends, relatives or employer and read the guidance below:
 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Reply
Please read the more detailed guidance below:
 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Your sources were largely social media, blogs, his own website, press releases or interviews, not independent third-party sources.
 * It's difficult to see why he meets our notability criteria, his achievements appear to be limited to seting up a couple of non-notable on-line companies and web sites
 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Nearly all your text is basically him talking abut himself, rather than any genuine facts, eg He promotes the idea that individuals must dare to pursue realizing their dreams... which accomplished to become a success...  From one perspective, he can be considered not only a business entrepreneur but also an IT entrepreneur... his adventure... he always sought ways for success and happiness without giving up.[3] Kapri aims to energize the youth in Nepal... and to provide a vision for tomorrow’s leaders. Having influenced young Nepalis, Kapri encourages individuals to pursue their dreams and give priority to their own goals in his speeches and social media messages... “If you don't like something, dare to say you don't like it! Don't sacrifice yourself thinking about what others will say.”[2] He often mentions that a remark by Winston Churchill on self-confidence and determination has been an important inspiration for himself
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

I'm not going to restore, it's just promo sourced to unacceptable references, and you already had a sandbox version, so it's unclear why you asked me Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi @Jimfbleak,
 * I very much appreciate your time to respond. It was certainly worth that because I have learned a lot. I will be sure to use all your advice (and others') as a checklist when I intend to write another article. Thank you. In fact, I spent some time to draft a letter providing insight about situations of potential contributors in my region. I want to share it when ready.
 * Regarding my request for restoring: Even if it seems like the same as the sandbox version, actually it's not. I had done some revisions and modifications on it, while I understand it still does not qualify as a Wikipedia article by far. I don't want to waste any more time on it. I just wanted to copy the code of that final version and archive it in my Google Drive. That's important for me to see my mistakes and weaknesses. Then I was going to remove all pages about Shankar from my User area. For this purpose, would you be able to copy-paste that final version into a page in my user area, temporarily? Or, alternatively, you can simply send it to me through this Google form, by pasting into the "Detail" field: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfDFMRjVjifwYm1o3g8CTx0uygA5O04AFwLpTZEcLHQVmTeUA/viewform
 * I'm a researcher and I value to archive any work for various purposes.
 * Secondly, I didn't anticipate that a draft would actually be deleted permanently. I thought it's an area for simulating and exercising what would happen in the main Wikipedia, as an orientation of new contributors. Otherwise, I would have backed it up beforehand. So I do want to backup my final work for my records even if it's useless in the Wikipedia space.
 * Thanks for your understanding.
 * Happy editing! Mehmetcaputcu (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * For some reason your ping to me above didn't work, but I've seen your message on my talk page now. I'll post the text temporarily here shortly. Copy it asap, because I will soon delete it again. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I responded on your talk page. Thanks. Mehmetcaputcu (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)