User talk:MehrdadFR

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is MehrdadFR. Neil N  talk to me 14:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Mjbmr (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Your recent editing history at Girl of Enghelab Street shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , see below. Drmies (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at My Stealthy Freedom. I don't have a "Final warning for disruptive editing", but by this time we might as well use the word "vandalism" to describe your editing against against consensus in that article. Drmies (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Jasbir Puar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Toddst1 (talk) 00:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Sock puppetry
Are you just filing under any master? Where is the overlap for the master here or [here]? Praxidicae (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

In particular - edit summaries of "rv to NPOV version, before VwM.Mwv's tendentious editing", "These are minor opinions, as well as conspiracy theories.",, "vandalism",, and "WP:LEAD is plagued by Zionist hate propaganda". (I'll note that the "Zionist" nature of the sources here is far from obvious). Furthermore, following 12:55, 10 March 2019 - coupled with filing 2 SPI reports - 13:03, 10 March 2019 (Sockpuppet investigations/Plot Spoiler), 13:13, 10 March 2019 (Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim) - this is quite a severe reaction. Icewhiz (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2019 (UTC)