User talk:MehwishA23

March 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Asim Ali have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asim Ali. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Asim Ali, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Asim Ali. CLCStudent (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

New topic? New article.
Greetings! The article Asim Ali is about a cricketer. It should not be completely overwritten to refer to a different subject.

If there is another person by that name who is notable, you need to start a new article with a disambiguated title, such as Asim Ali (actor) or Asim Ali (director).

That said, if you start a new article, make sure the subject is a notable person and that you cite reliable sources in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asim Ali. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not hijack the article topic. —C.Fred (talk) 15:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Asim Ali, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)