User talk:Mei ji

Hikvision
Hello, I'm Matthew hk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hikvision seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Matthew_hk  t  c  12:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Matthew,

Thank you for your message. Here are my opinions.

1. My amendments are from Hikvision official statement including their latest 1,8000 employee numbers, history, technology, and efficiency management.This is a very detailed introduction including their shareholders as well: http://www.hikvision.com/en/about_694.html

They also have their milestones on Facebook homepage and social responsibility program with WWF to protect the pandas. Such information are all officially confirmed, which I think is necessary to be mentioned.

2. About the IPVM, they are media who has right to give the report in their way but which is unsubstantiated. I believe Wiki is a fact-based platform should show the visitors the certain information instead of the unsubstantiated ones, or else it will hurt a brand like Hikvision. It is unfair to Hikvision.

That's why I think "controversy" part is really need to be listed or not, or maybe in some other way like Unsubstantiated claims by IPVM & John Honovich.

Thanks again for reading and hope my explanation is clear.

BR, Mei — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mei ji (talk • contribs) 05:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

First of all, removing incline citation and replaces with advertisement is not acceptable by Wikipedia guideline.

Secondly, if you are a staff of Hikvision it is highly doubt that you can't write it in a NPOV. On same NPOV basis, Wikipedia encourage to use more Third parties source instead of bluffing by the company own statement.

For the controversy. I have to check the source, it is a valid claim or not (such as Lenovo, although spyware claim was hardly be verified, but US Government treatment on Lenovo hardware was a fact). Given special situation in China that most (successful) companies were government owned, it is hard to tell Hikvision is natural monopoly by its patent and research ability or backed by government. Matthew_hk  t  c  06:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Matthew,

Personally speaking, I also don't like the advertisements. However, there is still valuable information in my editing for people to know Hikvision from different angles.

Please check diversity of reliable sources, which will be helpful and be more of NPOV.

Thanks.

BR, Mei