User talk:Mel BANG.

May 2020
Hello, I'm Mvqr. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Natasha McKenna seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvqr (talk) 10:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

so wait? it’s not a fact that Natasha McKenna was assasinated by police? was she not tied up and tasered unnecessarily? yet you feel like the more aligned cause of death is excited delirium? i clearly see this is a propaganda machine now Mel BANG. (talk) 10:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia presents material in the same manner reliable sources do. See WP:RS and WP:NPOV.--Mvqr (talk) 10:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

So is the New York Daily News not a reliable source? How about the Washington Post? The video evidence broadcasted by Fox, CNN, MSNBC, not reliable source? or unpopular public opinion? Mel BANG. (talk) 11:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Does the Washington Post call the killing of Natasha McKenna an "assasination by police"?--Mvqr (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

no but all sources state she was killed in police custody, not excited delirium Mel BANG. (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

obviously if we’re having this exchange your viewpoint is not neutral, direct me to someone a above you, your view is clearly propagating misinformation Mel BANG. (talk) 13:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Natasha McKenna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

you all are being reported and spread right now as the propaganda machine you are let’s see how long you are in business, because of some racist editors Mel BANG. (talk) 14:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)