User talk:Melakavijay

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chidambaram Temple has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.kadambutemple.blogspot.com (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Melakadambur
I have nominated melakadambur for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. The Enforcer Office of the secret service 07:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC) i'm native to this village iknow the informations given in that article are right to my knowledge pl UNBLOCK MY article melakadambur, thank you

CfD nomination of Category:Shivatemple Melakadambur
I have nominated shivatemple melakadambur for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Rajendra Chola I has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 17:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Kanipakam. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 17:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:RISHABATHANDAVAR 6x4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RISHABATHANDAVAR 6x4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Deletable image-caption/doc, you will be blocked from editing. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Karakkoil.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Karakkoil.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 12:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry
I was looking at the sentence the wrong way, I'll undo My edit. Imperial  Monarch  (D•R) 08:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Doing a quick look back, it would be best if you rewrite if if you want it to stay. Imperial  Monarch  (D•R) 08:54, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Melakadambur. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Imperial  Monarch  (D•R) 08:54, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please read the guidelines on external links to be avoided and reliable sources. Links to blogspot and suchlike unreliable sources are not acceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Dakshnamoorthy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dakshnamoorthy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Undue additions
I noticed that you have added description of Melakadambur shrines to many Hindu deity articles. Unfortunately the information being added is unsourced, sometimes dubious, and seems to be undue in the articles that need to cover all aspects of a deity. Can you discuss your edits on the article talk pages instead, and cite the reference (i.e., book, article, website) you are using for the content ? Your edits are also more likely to be retained if you reviewed them for grammar, spelling, capitalization etc. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Melakadambur‎ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Abecedare (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melakadamburtemple
A tag has been placed on Melakadamburtemple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fei noh a  Talk, My master 17:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MELAKADAMBURTEMPLE
A tag has been placed on MELAKADAMBURTEMPLE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you for 48 hours for continuing to add copyright violations despite being warned. Please take note of the messages above. Peter 17:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm native to this village Melakadambur i know all the details given are right to my knowledge so PLEASE UNBLOCK THE ARTICLE you can check the details given

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:RISHABATHANDAVAR.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RISHABATHANDAVAR.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fei noh a  Talk, My master 18:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for for creating a sock account to evade your previous block and again add copyrighted content to the Melakadambur   article.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Abecedare (talk) 09:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Arulmigu Amirthakateshwarar Thirukkoil
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Arulmigu Amirthakateshwarar Thirukkoil, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.asianart.com/articles/ratha/index.html. As a copyright violation, Arulmigu Amirthakateshwarar Thirukkoil appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Arulmigu Amirthakateshwarar Thirukkoil has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Arulmigu Amirthakateshwarar Thirukkoil and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Arulmigu Amirthakateshwarar Thirukkoil with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Arulmigu Amirthakateshwarar Thirukkoil.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dasa pujarishapathandavar.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Dasa pujarishapathandavar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. De728631 (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated addition of copyright violations despite being warned. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 19:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)