User talk:Melaman

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shunan English School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Hi878 (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shunan English School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Hi878 (talk) 05:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Well now...
First, I would recommend that you stay civil when talking to people, as they won't take you seriously when you talk like that to them. Second, do not accuse me of trolling, that entire article is filled with POV violations, and I was just trying to keep more of them out. Third, I think that you don't understand the point of Wikipedia. You're right, I'm not affiliated with it in the way that you mean. However, That doesn't mean that I can't revert what most would say is vandalism. In fact, that is one of the main parts of having an account on Wikipedia, reverting vandalism. Almost all of the users on Wikipedia aren't affiliated with it in that way, believe it or not. From now on, please try to keep your information as non-biased as possible. Hi878 (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

9 years on...
Well, here I am, 9 years later and only now seeing your response. First of all, NONE of the original information I wrote about Shunan English School was 'vandalism' or POV violations. Everything written was factual. I'm not in the habit of just making crap up for the sake of doing so, nor am I in the business of bad-mouthing someone or their business without justification. Over the years since this article was originally written, I built a website that reached within the top 25,000 websites of the world, bringing information on serial scammers to people, all over the world. As a result of a collaboration with other bloggers, information in one particular case, brought justice in the form of jail time being given to a scammer who stole millions of dollars from people. In light of this, the facts concerning the original post seem trivial in hindsight, but nevertheless, were/are, factual and not just my POV. I'm very well aware of what Wikipedia is about and (using another account) have long since posted thousands of articles on various matters. My original post may have had some anger behind it, but it was rightly justified. It certainly wasn't biased, unless you consider revealing the dubious misgivings of a person as 'biased'. Any attempt to hide facts from a post is a suppression of free speech. The post was/is not written with 'hate speech', ergo, no violation. I'll look forward to your reply and likely read it in 2028.

And I find it ironic that you have since gained a Vandalism level of 3 and looking at the logs, it seems you've been a very busy little troll, vandalising many pages!!

Nomination of Shunan English School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shunan English School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shunan English School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Pichpich (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Presidency of Joe Biden. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 17:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 17:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Listen lady, I don't know who you are or who you think you are, but I have multiple accounts on Wikipedia, two of which have more action than you could hope to see in your efforts.
 * You clearly don't give a damn for the truth, regarding both my comments on SES and Joe Biden!
 * First of all, you have absolutely ZERO clue about SES and its corrupt owner - you've never worked there, and likely you've never even set foot in Japan!
 * Secondly, the evidence against Joe Biden and his lies has become ever present more than ever! I'm sure that pains you and your ilk no end.
 * Please, don't bother to reply, I won't be back to read your insane liberal drivel, but I do hope that you get out more and actually get a life instead of suppressing the truth and facts that exist in this world.
 * I'll be using you for an example of how liberals suppress freedom of speech in my next article on my website. You'll have to do a Google search for when your name pops up.
 * Get a life. Melaman (talk) 05:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)