User talk:Melissa.v.green/sandbox

September 11th article: Most of the links go back to another wikipedia page, also there have been many revisions throughout the years. Most of the edits seems to be minor punctuation fixes but some are fixing major errors such as the number injured and fatalities. This article has a few bias' against the attacking party. Also some of the facts could be turned into present time instead of talking in the past. If the sources do not come from wikipedia they come from CNN or other news sources, with the occasional academic journal or study. I think that the response from the Muslim community was not represented enough, meanwhile the actions of federal government was over represented and repetitive.

Left-wing terrorism: Most of the links just have a name and a page number, but do not go to a an actual link to see the source. The article does not give much information as to why this ideology became popular, but it just give a very simple explanation of what it is. There is a very good representation of the history of the left-wing movement. There is not a lot of information given about the Leftist.

Melissa GreenMelissa.v.green (talk) 00:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)