User talk:Melissa.vp198

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Melissa.vp198, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 21:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Mentioned at WP:Arbitration enforcement
As you are aware, your name has come up at WP:AE with the assertion that you are a member of '110 Club Wikipedia.' The significance (if any) of membership in that group is now being discussed in the AE thread. Since you appear to be a participant, I am leaving you a case notice for the Longevity sanctions. This step is required by some of our processes. Thank you. --

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Longevity if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity. EdJohnston (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * EdJohnston, I see that you worded your explanation differently here on Melissa's talk page as opposed to my talk page. You stated that "this step is required of some of our processes."  Please enlighten us on what the exact process is, considering that I don't believe the process includes "sending a formal notice to all members of a forum just because they are members of that forum".  You told me that we cannot appeal a notice, but I would like to make sure that you are indeed following the process correctly as an uninvolved administrator.  Although, you have made those following statements suggesting that you have already formed your conclusion:

I respectfully request your reply to our concern here, EdJohnston. I hope you will understand that I will more than likely attempt to request assistance from some members of the Arbitration Committee to see if your action(s) has been appropriate to date. Thank you, Calvin  Ty  18:55, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * "I think that everyone who is part of the '110 Club Wikipedia' ought to receive this message." Why, pray tell?  Membership of a forum by and of itself cannot be used as a rationale to send a formal notice.
 * "you are probably aware that Arbcom takes offsite coordination very seriously. At a minimum, the AE will end with all of the members notified of the discretionary sanctions" '''I completely understand that canvassing is a violation of Wikipedia policy, and it may come to a determination by a closing administrator that is the case for some members, but all members??  All members of that forum getting a discretionary sanction (by the way, what does that mean?)??  Tell me again, what did I (and Melissa) do other than being guilty of being a forum member??
 * I have noted that I have made all necessary clarifications per your requests, but you have not responded to my feeling that the WP:AE should *not* be expanded outside the scope of the original request by David in DC to impose a two-week ban on NickOrnstein. Otherwise, itsmejudith has successfully turned the AE into a wider audience & scope that should be in a separate AE request.  After all, what if David in DC is not in agreement with the wider audience & scope?'''