User talk:Melissawwang/Quadratic voting/Adamng926 Peer Review

Overall, the content added was extremely detailed and covered much of what was missing in the original article. The only improvement needed is more reliable sources, and since there are so many sources already listed, it would not hurt to take away the ones that are outdated and no longer necessary (those sources that are more than 5 years old). It was also good to see that all contents were neutral, and much factual information was added regarding how quadratic voting works.

Peer Review Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Melissawwang/Quadratic_voting/Adamng926_Peer_Review