User talk:Mellen22

Welcome to Wikipedia
Doug.(talk • contribs) 04:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for welcoming me. Mellen22 (talk) 22:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Help please with APA
I'm in grad school and we are using APA style. I notice that the link in the toolbox called 'cite this page' adds a time stamp to the APA citation when the page was accessed. I've looked at the APA style guide, the newly released APA web guide, and the Wikipedia article on APA. And I can't find any comment about including a time stamp. And I'm not sure where to ask this question, since a tool doesn't have its own talk page. Mellen22 (talk) 17:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * If you are wanting to time stamp something, which you always should, use ~  D u s t i talk to me 19:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry. Perhaps I wasn't clear.  I do understand that if I post something in a talk page I should mark it with ~ .  But I was asking about a software tool that wikipedia has.  In the toolbox in the left margin is a link called 'cite this page'.  (only on regular content pages; not talk pages) Clicking on it takes the user to a special page that shows how to cite the page in an academic paper.  The citation for APA shows a time stamp (time and date) for when the page was accessed.  I can find no source which says that APA style calls for or allows the time the page was accessed.  All sources say that date alone should be shown.  Anyone have any clue who I would ask why this tool cites the time?  My entire class is waiting with baited breath. Mellen22 (talk) 23:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, ask the same question on the talkpage of the tool Wikipedia talk:Citing Wikipedia, the users on that page can help you. Mion (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd recommend the above user's suggestion, but if that doesn't work, try Reference desk. Personally (I have recently been using APA as well) I did not believe that the time was included. Also, here's a website my history teacher gave me on APA: . Also try . Laptopdude  Talk  23:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the help! Mellen22 (talk) 23:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Village Pump
If you have no luck getting any change, I would bring it to Village Pump for you. I definately think its important that the timestamp should be removed in favour of a permalink if that is more correct format. I don't think that low-traffic is really an excuse for ignoring this issue. Wikipedia is trying to become more academically recognized, and the 'cite this page' tool would be useful in achieving that objective. So, if change doesn't come about, I'll propose it at village pump with you. Billscottbob (talk) 03:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You seem to be doing just fine, even if you are new. If you want to be adopted, I can adopt you.
 * Anyways, Village Pump (proposals) would be the right place, as regular editors can't change Special pages. Billscottbob (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Teaching for Change
Hello, Mellen22: Please take a look at the changes that have been made to Teaching for Change since 2011. Do you feel that your concerns have been adequately addressed at this point? Cgingold (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Francis (conductor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London Symphony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Winners of the Los Angeles Times Women of the Year
Category:Winners of the Los Angeles Times Women of the Year, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, San Jose Symphony, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2019 (UTC)