User talk:Mellish fel

Prod Jaime Brooks
Hello! You have proposed the article Jaime Brooks for deletion per PROD and it was contested by another user. According to the guidelines, an article can be PRODded only once, so you can't use it anymore. If you believe the article should be deleted, please take it to WP:AfD. Also please avoid removing information without proper reasosning as you did with Grimes (musician). BEst, Less Unless (talk) 16:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Please take notice of this message, which is correct, and start a discussion at WP:AFD if you think Jaime Brooks should be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * From your continued edit-warring I can only conclude that you are deliberately trying to get blocked. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Grimes (musician). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NJZombie (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jaime Brooks.   Ashley  yoursmile!  16:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 21:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You were warned. Twice you were told to stop edit warring and take it to the talk page and you have done neither. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 21:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I have extended this block such that it no longer has an expiration date due to your block evasion as . Mz7 (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)