User talk:Melody583

Ali Dizaei
You may or may not have noticed that all of your edits on Ali Dizaei have been reverted. I'm sorry to say that they are, in the main, very poor edits indeed. By way of example:


 * this edit
 * Starts a section title in lower case
 * breaks a wikilink
 * removes valid content for no obviously good reason
 * added an unfinished yet still ungrammatical sentence
 * changes the case of Sir to sir - completely wrong thing to do
 * screws up the name of his book and breaks another wikilink

The remainder of your edits are pretty much as bad as this. So, take notice: I will continue to revert all such edits. If you wish to influence the Ali Dizaei article, you will have to substantially improve the quality of your edits. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ali Dizaei. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tagishsimon (talk) 13:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Ali Dizaei References
To add a ref to an article you put the link in here:  link here  (first ref bracket is open to show up here) then add it where you want in the article. John Cengiz  talk  22:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding inappropriately to the Ali Dizaei references section. References are there to support facts adduced in the article. The seciton is not a dumping ground for a mixed bag of press stories on Dizaei. There are hundreds of such press articles. The trick is to be selective in what is added. You are massively failing to be selective, and as a result, all that you add is being removed, rendering your actions pointless and annoying. Rule of thumb: if you are not adding to the article text, do not add a reference. Add only now and pertinent information to the article. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No, really, please stop screwing the article up. The link you are trying to add is already in the references as reference 25. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I see you've added the links again. And I've deleted them again. I deleted them because one is a repeat of an existing link, and the other was added without any context whatsoever. Why don't you try TALKING about what you;re trying to do, either here or on the talk page of the AD article. As I've already noted, all you;re managing to do right now is annoy people. All of the content you have added has been immediately deleted. And this will continue to happen until you understand what you're doing. Right now you patently obviously do not understand. --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Stupid
You're probably not stupid. But I don't understand why you persist in making the same changes to the AD article and appear impervious to the suggestion that the references are not a good idea, and are not well added. You know to edit a wikipedia article, but you choose not to hit the Edit link at the top of this page and say what it is you think you are trying to achieve. So I guess we're locked into this pattern of you adding junk, me removing it and dropping you a note, you adding it again in the hope that, somehow, this time, it'll stick. Ho hum. You might want to think about that and change your approach? Even, heavens, as I said, talk about your intentions here. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

68 for 0
You've edited the Dizaei article 68 times over the last 4 months. Not a single one of your edits has stuck. All have been reverted. Your current efforts to add a fact about a Dizaei child will not stick if you cannot provide a reference for it. Can I suggest, as I think I already have once or twice, that you talk to us on the article talk page here. You could tell us about what you want to add. We could provide advice on how best to add the information, or opinions on why the information would be unwelcome - and that would generally be because no reference is provided. Or you could keep going as you are, completely wasting your time. Your choice. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Tagishsimon. You seem not to have learnt.Ironman1104 (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ali Dizaei, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''This is your final warning. You have been warned fairly about edits to this article on numerous occasions.'' ISTB351   (talk)   (contributions)   16:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC)