User talk:Meltemdemir35

Speedy deletion nomination of Cosmedrome
Hello Meltemdemir35,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cosmedrome for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Historywiki11 (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Cosmedrome
Hello, Meltemdemir35,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Cosmedrome should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Cosmedrome.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Historywiki11 (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Cosmedro Page
Hello there, i nominated your page for deletion because there's no reliable source for on the web for your page. we couldn't find any article on Google News or other reliable sources. Unlike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegro_(auction_website). Historywiki11 (talk) 21:16, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Cosmedro
I'm sorry but i would advice you let another editor write about your company as i will be tagging you with a WP:COI tag in accordance to wikipedia's guidelinesLOP. If your company meet's notability guideline i'm sure an editor will write about it. Historywiki11 (talk) 21:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Please don't add information into wikipedia articles without providing references. Also, please don's list companies which don't have wikipedia articles. This is undue promotion and greatly disliked in wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of E-commerce in Turkey


A tag has been placed on E-commerce in Turkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mondaq.com/turkey/x/377342/Consumer+Law/Turkeys+New+Emerging+Market+ECommerce. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t) Josve05a  (c) 18:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)