User talk:Mem0207/Gender Empowerment Measure

Hi! Thanks for your article! I enjoyed reading your additions to the piece. I thought all of them furthered the depth of the article and were important to bring up. The example on Dr. Seipel's work was a good choice and added credibility. Not only did you give an overview of it, you explained it's importance and relevance to the topic. I'm curious (and I may have missed this), where the hypothesis comes from. Maybe had the origin data? I think that could be a great way to continue the paragraph. Under the same vein, past military funding, we also spoke about education and healthcare spending in class and the gender data on that – it could be cool to add commentary on these issues. For the debate paragraph, I appreciated how you brought in skepticism. I think an article’s credibility increases when both sides are shown. The fact that women from grassroots are no represented should definitely be there as well as the paragraph about how GEM is analyzed. Overall, great work. I’m excited to read the final product.

128.252.48.41 (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)