User talk:Memeraj

Welcome!
Hello, NatalieMeisner, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Natalie Meisner, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Based on a conversation on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help it appears you made the all-too-common newcomer mistake of naming your user account after your initial subject. To avoid problems of impersonation, you should change your username at Special:GlobalRenameRequest.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Meisner (November 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natalie Meisner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Natalie_Meisner Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Natalie_Meisner reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Meisner (November 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natalie Meisner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Natalie_Meisner Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Natalie_Meisner reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Natalie Meisner has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Natalie Meisner. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

paid editing
Hello NatalieMeisner. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NatalieMeisner. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * No I am not being paid for this - I am just trying to get this live, as I accidentally named my username, the Article name. NatalieMeisner (talk) 23:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, in that case, what is your relationship with Natalie Meisner? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you allowed to ask me that? I do not have a close relationship with her whatsoever, and I am not getting paid to do this. Memeraj (talk) 16:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Of course I'm allowed to ask how you would describe your relationship. It's then up to you to decide how you wish to answer, and what terminology you wish to use to describe it.
 * I ask this because your previous response only stated that you are not being paid for this editing. You might be writing about yourself, or your close personal acquaintance, or perhaps your cousin. None of these would involve payment (presumably), but they would all constitute clear conflicts of interest (COI), which must be disclosed. Now, arguably I could simply ask you if you have a COI, but experience shows us that many editors' understanding of what is or isn't a COI is markedly different from Wikipedia's definition of it. That is why it is more useful to ask how would the editor describe their relationship to the subject in their own words.
 * I should also add that the fact that your earlier username was that of the person you're writing about, is an immediate COI red flag, as it suggests an autobiography. However that came about, and whatever your reasons for selecting such a username (and I must say your explanation of this at the AfC help desk further confused, rather than clarified, the matter), it would be remiss of me to not inquire, at least. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Like I stated before, I wrote my username as the article title, as this is my first time writing a Wikipedia Page and I made an error. My name is Michelle and I just wish to get this done. She is not a close personal friend and not someone I know well - she is an author who does not have a page up in regard to her work and I wanted to be the one who wrote it, as I deem it is good practice as a writer myself. But rather its been a stressful experience, because individuals are quite rude who are meaning to "help". Memeraj (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Natalie Meisner
Your draft has improved somewhat since I looked at it earlier today. You now have some inline citations where before you had none. The trouble remains that nearly every sentence of the draft needs to cite a published source for verification. External links in the body text must either be removed, that is, unlinked, or converted to proper inline citations or, when a suitable target article exists, to a wikilink (or internal link).

The career section looks too much like a CV or resume when presented as bullet points, a style that is deprecated on Wikipedia.

The piped link  is improperly done: you should not have included 5th and Calgary as part of the text of the link. And, it needs a citation for verification. There's guy whose page I edited who declared himself the poet laureate of Calumet City, newsworthy perhaps as a stunt but not all that helpful for building notability.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Which criteria is deemed Advertising? Memeraj (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)