User talk:Memomori

Copyright problems with Kosorukov
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kosorukov, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.glebkosorukov.com/. As a copyright violation, Kosorukov appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kosorukov has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kosorukov and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Kosorukov with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kosorukov.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 11:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
In addition to the copyright issue mentioned above, the article Kosorukov was somewhat promotional in character, and it failed to indicate that the subject satisfied Wikipedia's notability criteria, particularly the criteria for people. Any one of these concerns would have been enough for deletion to have been considered. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)