User talk:Memotype

Is it that easy?
Yes, it is that easy, welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! &mdash;  Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  04:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * I've answered your questions that you asked on my userpage: remember to put userpages' that you add to on your Watchlist (using the Watch this page button) so you can track responses to your questions and comments. &mdash;  Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  04:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Vegan but eats chili?
Hunh? Categorized as Vegan but is a carnivore and eats chili?! Am I missing something?! Or is one material and the other figurative? Jpaulm 23:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh, actually, it's just a mix up. I stole the code for the vegan userbox and changed it to carnivore, and I guess I forgot to change the category on it... :P I'll fix that right now :) &mdash;Memotype 01:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Libertarianism
Plus it is now true. I was just working on that when you did it for me. Thanks! Whis key   Rebel  lion  04:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh... I just stumbled across the debate on the talk page and thought the solution was rather obvious... &mdash;Memotype 04:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

anarchism
Hi, Memotype. Please stick around at anarchism. We need you. Thanks. Whis key   Rebel  lion  19:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll be keeping my eye on it, but I'm not going to fight in any holy wars, and I can't guarantee that I'll be on any particular "side". Your usage of the word "we" scares me a bit, as I interpret it as a manifestation of an "us vs. them" mentality, which I will not participate in. &mdash;Memotype:: T 19:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That was not a correct interpretation. I meant we as in all the editors on that article. I am actually not on any side either. If an-caps were the ones dominating the article and keeping a fair representation of communist-anarchism out, I would want fairness for the inclusion of communist anarchism. All I want is a real encyclopedia. (I am not an an-cap, btw.) Whis  key   Rebel  lion  21:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That's good to hear... it's hard to tell these days on wp... &mdash;Memotype:: T 13:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Anarcho-capitalism and free education
Well first off, thanks for visiting my Userpage. To answer your question: I would favor anarcho-capitalism as the best system. However, I also acknowledge that it isn't likely to form (at least in my lifetime) and education is an issue I feel strongly about. Now if you want to get into a debate about free education fitting anarcho-capitalism, I don't know that our talk-pages would fit it all lol. Soxwon (talk) 15:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Man-page
Template:Man-page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Men's Rights". Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 15:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for 48 hours for persistent rudeness, personal attacks and assumptions of bad faith in this discussion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC).

January 2024
is an utterly inappropriate personal attack that sexualizes your disagreement with other editors. Commenting later that you rarely talk that way does not obviate your offense. This is a warning. Refrain from all such obnoxious personal attacks on your colleagues. Cullen328 (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Sexualize?!?! &mdash;Memotype:: T 05:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)