User talk:Memphis2006

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. · jersyko   talk  01:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not attempting to perpetuate a myth. Here's how Wikipedia works--articles state what is verifiable in reliable sources.  Wikipedia's goal is verifiability, not truth.  Thus, the number reported in a reputable newspaper article published today is what is used in the article.  That said, it's quite possible that Bellevue inflates their membership numbers, especially given the likely drop in membership after the scandals of the last year.  However, unless a reliable source can be found that contradicts the Commercial Appeal article, there's nothing we can do.  Also, if you have something to say about an article, say it at the article's talk page, not in the article text itself.  You can access any article's talk page via the discussion tab at the top of the page.  Thanks. ·  jersyko   talk  02:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)