User talk:Mennowiki

A page you started (A.D. Penner) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating A.D. Penner, Mennowiki!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please help show how this meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Hespeler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gretna ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/William_Hespeler check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/William_Hespeler?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steinbach, Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blumenort ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Steinbach%2C_Manitoba check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Steinbach%2C_Manitoba?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, references and citations
Recently you have made many new edits to Mennonite related Wikipedia pages, I just wanted to say thank you! I actually know much of what you have posted to be true. We do however have to follow Wikipedia's Manual of Style and in order to be able to verify sources we need to add the citations to the articles. Do see WP:Cite for more information on how to add these sources, it is imperative that we do this. Thanks again for all your great work, now to add the verifiability.  Krazytea  (talk) 00:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Anderson & Associates


A tag has been placed on Kevin Anderson & Associates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. signed,Rosguill talk 01:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack Thiessen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Thiessen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jack Thiessen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steinbach Regional Secondary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian White ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Steinbach_Regional_Secondary_School check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Steinbach_Regional_Secondary_School?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Preservings moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Preservings, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steinbach, Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Bank ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Steinbach%2C_Manitoba check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Steinbach%2C_Manitoba?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mennonite literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Hiebert ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mennonite_literature check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mennonite_literature?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT Mennonite people


A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT Mennonite people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 13:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Falk


The article Matt Falk has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and has been written in advertising manner. The article is recreated after being deleted previously."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abishe (talk) 13:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Kent Monkman
Hi, I want to ask you a favour, could you do not restore the "People from Winnipeg" and "People from Manitoba" categories, because there is already a category titled "Artists from Winnipeg" for it's subcategories. The person is improving the edits for the Kent Monkman article. Also I apologize by removing the Artists from Winnipeg category. If you can accept my apology in exchange do not restore the respective categories "People from Winnipeg" and "People from Manitoba" if you can accept the editor's apology and the "Artists from Winnipeg' will be kept and leave it alone. I hope the resolution will be solved. I will be happy for your reply. Thanks. 2605:8D80:444:5159:910B:1F16:2498:B131 (talk) 04:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jan Guenther Braun


A tag has been placed on Jan Guenther Braun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Dorama285 (talk) 02:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jan Guenther Braun for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Guenther Braun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jan Guenther Braun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dorama285 (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Falk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Falk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matt Falk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BonkHindrance (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Preservings


Hello, Mennowiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Preservings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:59, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Niigaanwewidam James Sinclair
Hello, Mennowiki,

Thank you for creating Niigaanwewidam James Sinclair.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"You must rewrite the sourced material in your own words. Do not copy whole sentences. Can you please attend to this now?"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Niigaanwewidam James Sinclair


The article Niigaanwewidam James Sinclair has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Delete if the close paraphrasing from his institutional website is not reworded."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Marvin Francis


The page Marvin Francis has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://main.lib.umanitoba.ca/francis-marvin;isaar?limit=10&sf_culture=en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Music of Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Prince.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Barkman Concrete for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barkman Concrete is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barkman Concrete until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 00:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethany College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Steinbach, Manitoba, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop edit warring to add back text sourced by a personal blog, and text that has no connection to Steinbach. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Randolph, Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steinbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Leonard Shaw
Hello, Mennowiki,

It is important, especially when tagging a PROD, to state what you are doing in an edit summary. Should the PROD tag be removed, it's important that editors can see that the article has already been PROD'd once and that is usually seen by scanning edit summaries in a page's edit history. Please always leave a relevant edit summary. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steinbach Regional Secondary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Pets.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture of Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Hiebert.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steinbach, Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semlin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Arnason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icelandic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Steinbach, Manitoba, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Mennonite Heritage Village
 * added a link pointing to Semlin
 * Sod house
 * added a link pointing to Semlin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mennonite Heritage Village, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semlin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rush.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Ryan Smith (mastering engineer) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ryan Smith (mastering engineer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 12:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Blumenort, Manitoba, you may be blocked from editing. First you went to the person's biography, add unsourced content saying the person lived in Blumenort, then you went back and added him as a notable person. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * What is the Wikipedia policy regarding changing unsourced content with other unsourced content? It seems odd you'd defend the original wording as if it was somehow more legitimate than mine, since, it too, was unsourced. The fact that I changed the wording doesn't make the content any more or less unsourced than it already was. I agree there should be a citation there, which is why I added it, but there's no reason to flag it as somehow disruptive, since it was never sourced information to begin with. Mennowiki (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I would also suggest that your automatic deletion of the content on the Blumenort and Royden Loewen page contravenes a number of recommendations listed here: Verifiability/Removal of Unsourced Material. For example, regarding biographies of living persons, "contentious material in such articles that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately." Rewording an article to say he lived in, rather than only attended school, in a certain community is not "contentious material" that needs to be removed immediately. Nor is it an "apparently ridiculous claim" or obvious vandalism. Furthermore, the guidelines state that "deleting a claim because it is inadequately cited is a decision that should be taken with consideration and care, and is not a call that contributors should make on unfamiliar topics." I'd be glad to hear about the consideration and care you took in reverting this edit and also would love to know how familiar you are with these topics. Again, I am not denying that this claim requires a citation, which is why I added one, but I am suggesting that you did not follow Wikipedia guidelines in reverting the edit. You should have tagged it as needing a citation or initiated a discussion in the talk page before automatically deleting it. Mennowiki (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Holdeman


The article John Holdeman has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "subject is not significant enough to deserve a Wikipedia page"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

The/Pixies
Regarding the issue of whether the band is called Pixies or the Pixies, I wouldn't be so sure. It seems to be a moving target. Here are a few Frank Black quotes:

"I don't see it any particular way. It just feels like we're the Pixies." 

"When the Pixies did a version of it as a B-side I called it 'Velvety Instrumental Version'." 

"He's on a quest, whether it's with The Pixies or in her own projects or whatever band that she's playing with."

There's also the album Death to the Pixies to think about. Popcornfud (talk) 10:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legrand Jazz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ryan Smith (mastering engineer)
Hello, Mennowiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ryan Smith (mastering engineer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Zealand people of Mennonite descent


A tag has been placed on Category:New Zealand people of Mennonite descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)