User talk:Menotyou

Alexis Amore
The bot broke the syntax of the comment markup. Check the history of the article and you'll see what I mean. You may want to check the bot's work on other articles to see if it made similar bad edits. Dismas|(talk) 10:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

good call, thank you. this is my first en masse edit. quick questions:

1. how can i PM you back? 2. is there a simple way to roll back changes to a previous revision?


 * 1) You leave a message on my talk page just like I have done here with yours.
 * Yes, see Revert to see how to go back to a previous version of an article.
 * 1) Leaving messages and reverting articles are rather basic skills here. You may want to read over more of the tutorials and help pages before making so many changes to so many articles all at once like this.  That's just a suggestion.  If you have any more questions, I'll be happy to try and answer them.  Dismas|(talk) 11:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

thanks for the tips
''I was just looking over some of the edit policies, particularly those related to external links and bots. It appears that these mass-created external links could be considered spam. What do you think? Is this sort of addition to the page justifiable?''

''It seems like an embellishment of an existing page to me, particularly where there is not already an image present, but I don't want to offend... As you noticed, I'm new here :)''


 * I don't consider it spam because you're adding a link to a well known search engine and not to a site that you run which you're hoping to get advertising money from. Although other editors may disagree.
 * Also, you can sign your comments on talk pages using four tildas (like this: ~ ). Using just three will just leave your name, four will leave your name and the time stamp, and five will leave just a time stamp.  Most people use four so that they have signed their comment and also it prints the date/time that the comment was made so that it's easy to see which person said which comment first, last, etc.  Dismas|(talk) 11:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Your bot
Ummm, I think you'd better stop running your bot. From Bots "We almost always prefer to rely on human input for editing, and only carefully designed bots are allowed."

And "Before running a bot, you must get approval on Wikipedia talk:Bots."

I strongly suggest you open a dialog before you are banned for spamming. &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 13:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

One more thing
I didn't feel comfortable clicking on the links before because I was at work. Now that I'm home I see an issue with them. For example, in the case of Houston, if you click on the link you get a large number of pictures of the city of Houston, Texas and not the woman. And then with porn stars with only one name like Chloe, the results show you quite a number of women, all of whom go by the name Chloe but aren't the same Chloe that the article was about. Dismas|(talk) 13:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Your bot is introducing errors
For instance, in Candy Barr, it changed the m-dash between birth and death dates from "—" to " & n d a s h ; ". As noted above, you need to work with others before running bots that might introduce errors. Jokestress 23:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

And a further problem
The Google links you drop are set with Safe Search set to off, yet there is no warning placed besides the Wikipedia link that adult content will be returned by the search. That's a big no-no in my book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabercil (talk • contribs) 18:34, January 24, 2006

More to the point
There's no encyclopedic purpose to link to Google for images of the person in an article... See WP:External links. DreamGuy 16:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Empornium.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Empornium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi
I see that you have not edited in a while. Come back! Uetz 17:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anita Blond
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anita Blond, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No reliable sources. No Assertion of WP:Notability. Fails WP:PORNBIO.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. David in DC (talk) 15:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)