User talk:MentisF

Image source problem with Image:Scholarship fund.pdf
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Scholarship fund.pdf. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. Thank you. HermesBot 17:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

– Krakatoa  Katie  06:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Mentis Foundation
Hello – thanks for the message. The article you cited had information but no claims as to its significance, and it was deleted under the criteria for speedy deletion (CSD). Specifically, the 7th criteria for articles, A7, allows users to tag this type of article for deletion without formal discussion, and authorizes admins to delete them.

In other words, what makes the Mentis Foundation important or significant? Lots of groups give college scholarships, but not all of them are important enough to rate inclusion in an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. If a group, or if no claim or assertion of significance is made, the article should be deleted.

This assertion of prominence is a separate issue from notability – in the case of groups like this one, the notability standard for organizations and businesses – and a lack of verifiable, reliable sources to support the article's claims. If the group can meet these standards and cite reliable sources to attest to the article's claims, by all means recreate the article and cite those sources for reference. If not, the group should not have an article.

If you disagree and believe the group does national work and is indeed significant, the article can be recreated by you or someone else. If any editor has a conflict of interest with any group, paid or not, Wikipedia urges such persons not to create or edit articles unless it can be done in a neutral tone with the aforementioned reliable sources.

We're not perfect, and it's a good bet there are Wikipedia articles about insignificant people, companies, and groups. However, their existence does not mean that this article should or should not exist, although it is still argued occasionally without success. I hope that I've answered your question. If you need more information or help, please leave a message on my talk page or place   on your user talk page. Thanks again, and welcome! – Krakatoa  Katie  06:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)