User talk:Mentoroso

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620292832 your edit] to Eurasian Economic Union may have broken the syntax by modifying 8 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Help needed
I'm new to Wikipedia and have been improving an article with the best of my ability to get it ranked as a good article. I and other users are actively working to make it fit the Featured article criteria. It's been nominated as a good article and has been waiting a review for months. The article in question is the Eurasian Economic Union. The problem is, that the union launches on January 1, and that is when it will be getting most of its traffic. Is there any way to have the article assessed before that date?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks,

Mentoroso (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * , in a word, no. There is no deadline on Wikipedia, especially since we are all volunteers. The article will get reviewed when it gets reviewed, and pestering people to get it done faster might actually make the process take longer. Another thing to remember is that Wikipedia is not free advertising space, and a neutral point of view is vital. Primefac (talk) 01:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Primefac, I did not say there was a deadline. What I was saying is that an article equivalent to the European Union (the latter which gets 10'000 views per day), probably should be looked at before its launch date, if we're serious about making it a higher quality encyclopedia. My intent wasn't to advertise and I am not doing so, as the EEU is not selling any products, it's a supranational body. As for NPOV, I didn't really understand what you were referring to.


 * Cheers
 * —Mentoroso (talk) 11:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Technically speaking, a Good Article (or Feature Article) should be at GA (or FA) quality before it gets approved officially. So if you've applied for review, then it should already be a GA/FA quality article. The title isn't really that important in the long run (or for the majority of people who will be reading the article). As for the NPOV, that doesn't really apply in this situation and I'm honestly not sure why I mentioned it. Primefac (talk) 23:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eurasian Economic Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Religion of the Eurasian Union
Please add a section on religion to Eurasian Economic Union and include a graph. --24.114.103.136 (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eurasian Economic Union
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eurasian Economic Union you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eurasian Economic Union
The article Eurasian Economic Union you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eurasian Economic Union for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, Thank you, I'll look into fixing any issues.—Mentoroso (talk) 21:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eurasian Economic Union
The article Eurasian Economic Union you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eurasian Economic Union for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Eurasian Economic Union
You did an amazing job! The article is very comprehensive. I read the whole thing and corrected minor mistakes. Overall, it's a great article. Keep up the good work! N ataev talk 14:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

EEU accession dates
The reason why I (and other editors as well) reverted your edits was because you made it seem that Armenia and Kyrgyzstan acceded to the EEU the same date that Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan did, which is simply false and not true. Armenia and Kyrgyzstan did not sign on 29 May 2014. If you watch the signing ceremony, only 3 countries signed the initial treaty which was Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan. Your recent edit is more then acceptable, but please refrain from making it seem that there were 5 original signatories from the beginning, because there wasn't. Thanks, Archives908 (talk) 14:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Politics of the Eurasian Economic Union
Template:Politics of the Eurasian Economic Union has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EAU evolution timeline
Template:EAU evolution timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)