User talk:Mercury543210/Archive2

Historicity of Jesus:Talk - re unsigned post
Thanks for pointing that out, I've signed it now!

I think there used to be a bot that automatically signed unsigned posts - presumably it's either gone out of action or didn't work on that post for some reason. I wouldn't have minded, and I suspect that most other people wouldn't, due to the existence of the bot anyway, which no-one complained about!

Thanks for letting me know! TJ 11:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

P4
Good work with starting P4. I hope you don't mind that I expanded it and reformatted the references. I didn't realize you were still working on it at the exact same time as me, so I ran into some edit conflicts. Hopefully, nothing was lost in the shuffle.-Andrew c [talk] 23:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: UBX
No problemo :-) I certainly don't mind others building off of my work.  That's what a wiki is all about, anyway ;-) --  P.B. Pilhet  03:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Second Epistle to the Thessalonians
Excellent work on this article - thorough, even handed, and informative. If only everybody who contributed took the same care! --Rbreen (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. Thanks for your improvements.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 07:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

re:First Epistle to Timothy
I fixed the talk page issue. Apparently the talk page has been at Talk:1st Timothy for over a couple years, and just today someone deleted the redirect (but not the actual talk page). Moving Talk:1st Timothy to Talk:First Epistle to Timothy has restored the talk page. As for your second request, because an anonymous editor hasn't even edited the article since January 6th, I can't say that semi-protection would be helpful (in that the article is not currently under attack, nor does it seem to be frequently visited by vandals). But I will watchlist it now so another set of eyes will be on the look out for future vandals. Hope this helps, and thanks for contacting me regarding these issues.-Andrew c [talk] 00:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry I haven't been around more to give active input into these articles. I will say this about semi-protection, there has only been 1 or 2 anonymous or newly created users who have edited this page in the past month. And all of those edits have been in good faith, and not blatant vandalism. The anonymous user hasn't even edited in 4 days. Therefore, the status of the article does not meet any of the requirements for Protection_policy. Sorry. ;)-Andrew c [talk] 21:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

WIKI Editors discussed in external forum
FYI This is a quick note to point your attention to the following website where you are being discussed:  This is the Acharya S forum where your wikipedia identities are displayed and you are part of the conspiracy to censor her. I have been on the receiving end before, probably will be again. Please delete this comment so that I can delay the retribution for a while. thanks. Jchurchward (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Following was posted on poster's site (+ their reply):

If you want to leave nasty comments on someone's page at least have the courage to sign them.
Mercury543210 (talk) 21:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) WP:AGF. Looks like I was in such a hurry to try and get you blocked for editwarring that I didn't type enough tildes.
 * 2) If the message is both true (it was; review your edit history as desired) and "nasty" (your words), then that's not particularly my problem. See WP:UWT for similar messages. Jclemens (talk) 21:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Just for my record I checked, and I only carried out ONE reversion! Jclemens was a bit hasty. Mercury543210 (talk) 22:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)