User talk:Meredithka

Welcome!
Hello, Meredithka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Chained library. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Buster Seven   Talk  22:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Thanks for the Nuthead Printers Contributions
Thanks for helping out on the St. Mary's City, Maryland article and for adding the section on Mr. and Mrs. Nuthead! It is great to have new contributions over there.

Someone put a banner over your contribution, though, complaining that it all relied on only one reference/citation source. Do you have time to add any more citations for that section?

It was also placed in the wrong historical point in the article timeline, but I moved it to the right time-period (1670s). It's not a big deal at all though, it is actually great to have new material added.

I hope you contribute there whenever you like! We could use more editors there!

Appreciatively, Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Debra Davis


A tag has been placed on Debra Davis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Debra Davis


The article Debra Davis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dog six (talk) 23:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Debra Davis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debra Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Debra Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dog six (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Debra Davis. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 19:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)